Skip Navigation

User banner

Dame

@ dameoutlaw @lemmy.ml

Posts
3
Comments
12
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Ideally, what would "discovery" look like on a social network?

    Jump

  • There’s honestly nothing wrong with any of those options including 2. I get people see algorithm and recommendation and have aneurisms but this space isn’t looking to harm anyone intentionally. If there’s any space we should trust with any kind of algorithms it’s this space as there’s not the same incentives that Big Social has. As long as users can consent and have control.

    But to answer your question it would take some hybrid search on top of an aggregator that is explicitly public and respects people’s flags. I know Mastodon is working on a discover service

  • Why is Mastodon struggling to survive?

    Jump

  • Do you mind linking your script?

  • Why is Mastodon struggling to survive?

    Jump

  • How is mastodon healthier? Please provide examples. Healthier for whom? As there’s an extensive list of people harmed that absolutely do not find mastodon “healthy” let alone “healthier” particularly Black and Brown folks. Bluesky defaults to the same way feeds are presented as Mastodon does, so your statement is false

  • Lemmy total number of users last month (very close to 1.5 M users)

    Jump

  • The statement about comment history is inconsiderate. People absolutely care about their content. I don’t have to know nor care for their reasons why but it is important to users.

  • ActivityPods 2.0 is out!

    Jump

  • Correct. You have access controls to your POD thus the data within it. As long as there’s an app built for a platform compatible with the protocols ActivityPods is compatible with, which are currently ActivityPub and Solid protocols it will work. It’s not just microblogging and not only compatible with Mastodon. So you can host your POD which would be best or even use a provider which you still have access controls. It’s like renting a locker or storage pod

  • ActivityPods 2.0 is out!

    Jump

  • All it would require is someone making an app on top of it the same way the devs built Mastopod. They built it on top of SemApps which makes it relatively easy to built apps on top of ActivityPods

  • ActivityPods 2.0 is out!

    Jump

  • That’s not true it’s compatible with anything running ActivityPub. It currently has build a Mastodon client as a demo that’s why right now you can use it with Mastodon. They built Mastopod in a week. Part of the pitch it showing devs how relatively simple it is to build apps on top of it. So if someone builds a Pixelfed, Lemmy etc app then you absolutely can use it

  • Beyond technical features: why we need to talk about the values of the Fediverse (part 1)

    Jump

  • It’s because of how people people on mastodon freak out over privacy and consent. That’s why he wrote that article as the expectations and views of a large number of users are fundamentally against what actually happens

  • Phanpy - A minimalistic opinionated Mastodon web client.

    Jump

  • It’s not just for mastodon users, that’s selling it short

  • What made everyone move to Bluesky or Threads instead of Mastodon?

    Jump

  • What made everyone move to Bluesky or Threads instead of Mastodon?

    Jump

  • This is weird on multiple levels, Bluesky code is Open Source, it’s federated and no one gives a damn about it being a PBC. It’s mostly about culture why people have gone to Bluesky and Threads

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world
    Dame @lemmy.ml

    The perfect Lemmy app?

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world
    Dame @lemmy.ml

    Any alternatives for Artifact users? Ideally, Fediverse integrated

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world
    Dame @lemmy.ml

    Fediverse apps