So he basically convinced her to put on a play in the role as the bride. She checked to make sure it wouldn't be legally binding, found out it wouldn't unless she had already signed a document. cool. she does the play and then finds out he faked her signature. was he inspired by count olaf?
she just had someone she loved and trusted commit fraud. awful, awful man.
I learned pretty recently that facial expressions are part of ASL and can change a sign's meaning.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-criticizing-sign-language-interpreters-195855277.html here's an opinion article that gets into this current controversy more.
But, on the facial expression question, these links are more about that:
from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3593340/
https://www.lifeprint.com/asl101/pages-layout/facialexpressions.htm
Basically, facial expressions are grammar in ASL. There are specific meanings assigned to them, which is different than the more subtle nuance that would've been my first guess too, a while ago.