Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
1
Comments
237
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • That’s all valid.

  • The velocity of those goalposts is astounding.

  • Check out Vivaldi. Yes it's still Chromium. Consider reading the link.

  • I just farted

    lol

  • What if I flip both at once?

  • 1705 here… I hate ST.

  • Good point.

  • Since the first time I heard about FSD I’ve been wondering why Tesla (or others) doesn’t set up a system where drivers opt-in (no opt-in by default) to sending anonymized driving data to help train the model. The vast majority of the time, it’s probably modeling OK driving. At least no accidents. But the shitty driving and accidents are also useful as data about what to avoid.

    Maybe they’re already doing this? But then I wonder why their FSD is getting shittier rather than improving. One would think with more driving data, good and bad examples, would only help.

  • I shid

  • Been following this company’s development for over a decade now. I really want them to succeed but I have major doubts.

  • Yeah I’ve had to go back and fix (re prompt) some things like this in the past.

    The headline is that it helps me code things far faster than if I was doing it myself. And sometimes saves me 100% of the work.

  • I used it the other day to spit out a ~150 line python script. It worked flawlessly on the first try.

    I don’t know python.

  • Yeah, agreed. That’s not what I asked though.

    This response is a bit of a misdirection since we all discuss shit that isn’t the most important all the time.

  • Given what I think I know about LLMs, I agree. I don’t think they’re the path to AGI.

    The person I replied to said AGI was never going to emerge.

  • They'll find a way to blame Dems in the end too, I suppose.

  • Are you assuming LLMs are the only way humans could ever try making an AGI? If so, why do you assume that?

  • It sounds hyperbolic but if you assume it will reach human-level intelligence and will have the ability to update its own code, you very quickly have something much smarter than us. Whether it will want to help or hurt us is an unknown. Whether we can control something that's smarter than us (and getting smarter every second) is unlikely, IMO.

  • "You've chosen the wrong phone" is peak lemmy.

    Second only to "ditch Windows, use Linux. I don't care about your use case".

  • Glad I'm not the only one. I read it 3 times and still don't know what's being said.