That's what I thought so too but when I did a quick search eelier I did see some underground results. I will have to do more digging.
Not good.There have been countless threads on the subject.https://lemmy.world/post/42124818https://mander.xyz/post/45953148https://sh.itjust.works/post/46320374https://reddthat.com/post/49485312And so on. Sorry for the non instance-agnostic links.
You really shouldn't be so downvoted for sharing your experience. While not ideal it's valid and understandable.
That's disappointing. At least on bright side maybe this means there's enough people leaving MAGA that they think it's a viable market to grift? But then to what end?
When I saw this notification without context I assumed yes but actually in this instance I don't think so.Sound pollution (Wikipedia)
No, it's the wording of the title. Without additional context it could be read as referring to all people in Los Angeles
English is vague like thatEdit: I think we're filling in a space and we each subconsciously pick one.Ex:TIL that [some] people in Los Angeles live completely surrounded by trafficTIL that [all] people in Los Angeles live completely surrounded by trafficTIL that [there are] people in Los Angeles [that] live completely surrounded by trafficTIL that [the] people in Los Angeles live completely surrounded by trafficEtc.
Maybe not what you're looking for but Lemmy has been used that way.