Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
1
Comments
872
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Most often I don't get a choice. There is one system that makes sense for this because it is already in use.

    My house was made in a standard system - the studs are 16 inches on center. The pipes are half inch (there is nothing half inch about pipes if you measure them). Using metric would be a big pain because the house was designed around standard measurements and so things are much easier to stick with it.

    Our roads are standard. I can set my speedometer to metric - but then I'm in danger of breaking the law if I forget to convert. I tell someone "go X km and turn right" - but they won't know what a km is, and their odometer won't tell them either.

    I work with farmers in Candada who measure crop yields in kg/acre because their local elevator buys their crop by the kg, and their land was measured in acres long before the country went metric - this is mostly about where they put the roads so land makes more sense when you measure in standard even though everything else in the country is metric.

    I use metric where there is no reason in the real world to do otherwise. Which means I mostly don't use metric because almost everything I do deals with the world around me.

  • 5/9 is close enough to half for most purposes, and 30 is close enough to 32 - you can be within a reasonable margin of error converting to F/C with much easier math. Sure it isn't perfect, but most of the time you don't need that accuracy in the first place.

  • BSD BSD BSD. read that in a chant of course.

  • You really have bought into the echo chamber if you believe that.

    There are bad people on both the right and left wing. However the majority on either side are not bad. Most (on both sides) have not thought deeply about the effects of if their ideas really were done in the real world. (A few have and have decided the downsides are worth accepting, but if you are not aware of the downsides and intentionally accepting of those as the least bad compromise you are part of the problem) We can disagree on which downsides are not bad enough to ignore - but everything has downsides.

  • I didn't realize that about clients. (apparently since I last checked some instances have an algorithm as well). That makes downvotes from just annoying and demotivating to active censorship. There is a large number of people who will downvote anything they disagree with, and if clients or instances use that as a signal it really is harming discussions.

  • Problem is you are now in an echo chamber of left wing hate. Oi course the hate of the left wing is different form right wing - but just at evil

  • There is no algorithyn. There needs to be but the cultrure is opposed and has made downvote not a useful signal. Downvote here means 'I disagree with this insightful comment'. Most other places downvote means 'this is trash just one step above so bad the mods should delete it'

    some of the mods (.ml) are famious for their delete anything they desagree with.

  • most homes don't run their computers in multi-user mode. Even when they do most kids will learn the admin password because parents don't select good passwords.

    Kids are not stupid. Even if some are, there are many kids in school and so any bypass will spread kid to kid fast. For each of the following reread this paraghraph to remind yourself all kids will know this.

    kids can install linux /bsd on a raspberry pi or old/cheap computer - this is something I want to encourage. that of course means they are root and can claim whatever age. They can likewise do it in a vm.

    if there is any security flaw kids can use it to change their age.

    many programs will not check when they should. Kids will install/use these instead. this is a likely exploit vector of actors (in foriegn counties) that target kids - release a new program that does what the kids wants while also doing what they want. (Websites have done bitcoin in javascript while you read them)

    who will check? onlyfans probably will, but small web sites spring up all the time, and they won't bother - many are already illegal (either copyright or illegal content).

    Meanwhile many programs that we want kids to use won't bother to check. why would things autocad check - they target professionals but kids can use them and may even have to.

    the above is not a complete list!

    Age is useful for 'buy cigerettes' that is illegal for kids in some way.

    However most of what parents care about isn't automatically bad and I know plenty of panents who are frusterated because we can't controll things how we need to without being a helicopter parent (bad). Playing video games is fine in moderation - AFTER YOUR HOMEWORK IS DONE - but we don't get an easy way to enforce that. My teens are old enough to stay home alone and do homework - but they will not do their homework when they can do something else (this problem has been around since school)

    my kids phones have parental controls that I turn on. However they lack a way to enforce homework vs play vs sleep time. There is likely more, this is just what frusterated me yesterday. some things are not gated - my kids have got up at 3am, and connected their school device (under school control not me) to their phone hotspot (turned on who knows when - I can't block that at all) to play a game that the school will block next week when they figure out it is one kids are playing but they shouldn't.

    people are proposing age verification because they have no idea what else they can do and are frusterated at how bad things are.

  • I was taught basic programming in school - by people who clearly had no clue. (it was clear to 11 year old me, and in hindsight I was far to kind in my evaluation of their knowledge) I was also taught on the then very modern apple IIgs - I wouldn't be surprised if you have never heard of that, but all you need to know is nothing I was taught is relevant anyway - if you were taught on windows 7 a lot of what you learned has changed anyway.

    Point is we need to teach people to teach themselves because things change.

  • I have all the parental controls I can enabled - but hotspot is one soften requested feature I can't block. I can block chrome completely but I can't unblock it for my kids online piano lesson because they are on youtube which means every video is unblocked despite only one channel of interest. Next thing I know they have been watching youtube shorts slop.

    i also can't control the school issued device which they have do some homework on. Often homework includes watch an educational video on youtube

  • I have never supported mandatory age verification on devices - it cannot work.

    i want the same things people who are for is want - but I want a system that works in the real world. I don't know what that system is. I know parents and schools are hurting because we don't have a useful solution.

  • At what point do I change from a concerned parent protecting my kids to an over protective hellicopter parent?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • My wife often does my laundry - but she has better things to do with her time.

  • the school devices are locked down. However your experience shows why the locks are not good. Too many useful searches could be bad. They are not going to assign a team of humans to review every search result. Either they whitelist things so restricted that you can't research anything or they blacklist so little things not on the list spread faster than they can block. (Both is a real possibility)

  • I don't care about your device. The school devices are lockee down - but it isn't feasable to lock everything down and still have a useful device for the things they need to do.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I want my share of those resources to go to my retirement account. A shorter work week would be better. Or maybe a machine to do my laundry so I can do other things with my limited time on earth.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Not by enough. We will advance, but the speed of light is still a hard limit that we won't get close to.

    we are not able to detect a civialization as advanced as us but orbiting our nearest star (which probably can't have life as we know it) if they aimed all their antennas at once at us and we happened to turn all our antennas to them at the right speed.

    there is no reason to think we can make a spaceship that will make it to the nearest star. Even if we could make a generation ship survive, if the star doesn't have perfect conditions for life we won't be able to redirect to enough stars to hope to find one (assume one exists and we ignore the ethical problems of invading like that - both we should not ignore but this is too long already)

    mars is just slighly more life friendly than the worst parts of antartica. We could maybe get something there self supporting, but it will be with massive investments. Everything else is far far worse. (We will probably get someone to mars and back in a few years, but it won't be a place to raise a family)

    anything worth doing in space involves robots. If you want to 'inspire man' or make life better on earth there are better ways.

  • Almost everything is a webpage these days. Or a youtube video

  • They are enabled - the kids have found bypasses. Turning on the hotspot and then using their school device for instance