Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
47
Joined
8 mo. ago

Fumbling through this capitalist hell-scape one gay step at a time.

  • Yes, unfortunately they are, and I do think efficiency is going to be a significant research front for open-weight models. The nature of this topic is highly speculative as our compute capabilities have only recently reached what is required to consider running generative AI models, what we have today are very crude first implementations of what I personally believe will become an everyday tool for developers, and more.

    And we have seen this, there are models now capable of running on an individual's hardware (and not particularly expensive hardware either) that can outperform what ChatGPT initially launched with.

  • Unfortunately not yet, no, true FOSS models are likely many years away, but I would argue that that follows typical FOSS lifecycles. Emerging technology is typically outperformed by proprietary endeavors, which creates an audience, and then that audience undertakes a FOSS implementation that initially underperforms, then just about competes, then eventually overtakes (i.e, GNU/Linux).

  • If the model is adequately FOSS, i.e. open weights, and can run on a single consumer GPU (or NPU), and the "author" (quotations because I'm personally undecided if one can claim code generated by an aforementioned model is theirs) understands it, then I really don't see what the problem is...

    Personally I have nothing against SLMs/LLMs as a technology, to me my grievances against ChatGPT or Claude are mostly about their environmental impacts and selling us back our own art, also keeping knowledge behind a for-profit black-box - if those aren't appropriate for a specific model, then I say using that model is fair, and good for productivity.

  • Well yes, there are several other policies and mannerisms of yours besides the 21-year-old MLDA that are quite frankly inscrutable to me.

  • Laughs in British.

    By the time Americans are trying alcohol for the first time, some of us are straight up alcoholics and have been trying to quit for several years.

  • We like getting ipkinky with the ipchains and the ipwhips and the ipgags.

  • Rat3

  • Fine, you know what, corporations gonna corporate, yes you need our companion app so we can datafarm your phone and continue to extract wealth from you after purchase.

    Okay, but I ask WHY does this not have offline local storage to keep operating when offline?

  • The Spiral? Is that a Magnus Archives reference?

  • When I didn't smoke, I thought it smelt quite nice actually. Now that I do smoke, I still think it smells quite nice.

    Then again my two other favourite smells are engine exhaust and fresh paint so my nose is fucked seven ways from Sunday.

  • andrew tate the reprobate

  • Not for those of us on the dbzer0 instance 😭

  • Salmonella

    You cook them, solved.

    High choleserol

    You don't base your diet on 100% eggs, limiting your diet to any one food will be damaging regardless.

    Prostate cancer

    Sure, higher risk, from what baseline? Varies massively per-person, and people's risk-tolerance is subjective... Personally I don't really care.

    Diabetes

    Again, significantly higher chance, from what baseline? 0.02 is 100% higher than 0.01, misleading.

  • Fuck me you're still going on about this? Man get a life with some real problems... Didn't know people could get so pressed about fucking eggs.

  • Clearly wasn’t a particularly good university, and anyway, this is nutrition, not health.

  • Well unfortunately you haven't got what you wanted, you clearly have a very simple view on nutrition, and a concerning lack of intelligence.

    What is an egg? It is a vessel to grow a living organism in a self-contained environment, providing all the resources needed to do so.

    Resources such as:

    • Vitamins
    • Amino-acids
    • Antioxidants
    • Healthy, unsaturated fats

    If an egg was so bad for your health, I ask you quite simply, how the hell do they support a chick during a very intense time of rapid growth?

    That's like saying being in a womb is unhealthy for a developing foetus.

    Please, next time, perhaps try updating your knowledge to something a bit more modern than WW2 before "jumping in and correcting" anyone again. With the constant stream of AI slop onto the internet, the last thing we need is human slop too.

  • 100% this, thankfully I’m lucky enough that in the near future I may be living in a quiet cottage. It’s always been a goal of mine to be self-sufficient, and that process will begin there.

  • Again, scale.

    How much of the meat produced is actually eaten? What’s the chance for each garment produced to actually be worn more than once?

    The current system can downsize significantly without needing to raise prices, as we’re already in a significant surplus.

    The point at which products are no longer guaranteed due to demand is when the prices have to go up.

  • As much as I find chickens, and all avians in general, cute and I find it sickening the way they are treated... I do love eggs, they're tasty, versatile, easy to cook, and unbelievably healthy.

    I think the differential we have to identify is one thing, and that is scale.

    I am not a vegan, I do not believe it is wrong to consume animals or animal-sourced products, however I do support animal welfare and believe that if we are to raise livestock for consumption they should be treated as the sentient, thinking, feeling creatures that they are and cared for accordingly.

    Imagine instead of human and animal rights we just had "sentient rights", for example.

    Being able to test for sentience is a topic in and of itself, and out of scope for my argument.

    I think there is no harm done in, a hypothetical world where people had the space to do such a thing, raising our own livestock, limited to individual homesteads or the immediate settlement (a local town market, for example).

    The line where it becomes unethical is quite obvious really, are the animals treated as living things, or machines to simply fuel and feed to grow them for slaughter and harvest? Yes, in my example of fair treatment the goal may be to raise them for eventual slaughter, but its their lifelong treatment where this applies, not the overall objective.

  • cats @lemmy.world

    Cats can have a little slommy.