Skip Navigation

Posts
3
Comments
110
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • That's true for every service, centralized ones included.

    You just might need to use something else for your name.

  • charging you money for the pleasure of cleaning up fake shit

    Since when is cleaning up any kind of shit pleasing?

  • Cloudflare? Cloudflare acting as a MITM is the last thing I wish.

  • I don’t recommend LW, it’s full of Redditeurs and defederated from instances I like such as hexbear and lemmygrad.

    Ah, that explains it. Have a nice day.

  • I have not been convinced lemmy.world being the largest instance is actually a bad thing. It’s bad for federation, I suppose, but they’re all Redditeurs and I appreciate having a containment zone for them.

    Most people here are from reddit or other centralized and enshittified platforms such as Twitter.

    LW got recommended often and it created a snowballing effect, which is why it became the biggest lemmy instance. Unfortunately people keep doing it and LW admins refuse to close down their registrations temporarily to allow other instances to get some traffic as well. That's why some people (like me) advise people (like you) to stop recommending LW over other instances.

    And LW is not a "containment" zone for former redditors.

  • no, I migrated away from LW a few months ago. I am currently on discuss.tchncs.de

    I think you confused my current account with the inactive one on LW that I only use for moderating in asklemmy sometimes.

  • pretty much. That's why the discussion is still on draft.

  • LW pretty much made the Lemmyverse almost centralized, thanks to people like you.

  • There once was a discussion going on to implement DIDs in ActivityPub.

  • Alacritty

  • That's not a bluesky "instance". That's the PDS. Edit the clickbait title please.

  • np

  • what will happen to grapheneos with those quantum predators?

  • Update on this matter:

    I made a feature request for including an image hash with the image_details table but it seems like they will be adding a blurhash field instead, which is unique enough for a temporary cache that will at most probably cache ~100 images at best.

    Oh and yeah, you probably should get ready to support blurhash in your client. It both acts as a small hash and a way to show blurry "previews" of the image.

    Links: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/5238

    https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/5142

  • I give them a thumbs up.

  • Mull (Firefox)

  • Looks like lemmy api does not give the hash of the image, that's unfortunate.

    You'd need to use the link field instead.

  • You can use the hash for image caching.