If the spec contains default values why not make a constructor with all the missing fields or implement Default when all fields are covered?For the first implementation I wanted to keep it simple, I don't exclude that in the future it will change.Also lol:Yep, I still need to figure out deep macro testing, for now I use the integration tests and cargo expand. This will absolutely change in the future :)Thanks for the feedback!
Opensource @programming.dev asperan @programming.dev 1y ago declarative-env 0.1.0 released crates.io /crates/declarative-env
Rust @programming.dev asperan @programming.dev 1y ago declarative-env 0.1.0 released crates.io /crates/declarative-env
For the first implementation I wanted to keep it simple, I don't exclude that in the future it will change.
Yep, I still need to figure out deep macro testing, for now I use the integration tests and cargo expand. This will absolutely change in the future :)
Thanks for the feedback!