It's funny because trip-hop landed in pretty much elitist, conceptual album category for snobs and luxury products' ads, with sampling being one of it's core features. Useless gateekeping and/or mischaracterising the 'art' word as something well-defined.
The sense of security is what makes the tongues talk and the users browse, them incriminating themselves openly. Overly violent law that puts everyone in the grey zone allows you to pick anyone you want at any time and jail them. Government/party structure of any size is pretty much unable to track everyone 24/7, so while it's seemingly a compromise from the idealistic vision of the great firewall, it is better to control a thing that organically rise with or without your involvement. If it could've been inpenetrateable, we could've heard of alternative systems appearing, but there you see none of these, at least for average consumers. It is there, and while it's not overingineered, it's enough to make 50% of safe, normie people give up and other 50% marks itself, and, unless everything is e2e encrypted, writes it's court cases for itself.
I may be wrong, but isn't NYC more of a money generator than it's a receiver? If that's so, I don't see how NYC would suffer, but it would widen the divide between such areas and poor dotational ones, making their people possible maga recruits.
Schools in my area had a dress code, and my school almost succeeded at requiring a select jacket model as a must (done by a single local company connected to a school admin, wink-wink), but faced backlash over poor price/quality balance 🙃
One of the unusual upsides, many men well in their 20s, who otherwise couldn't be bothered, had their high school formal suits to wear on future funerals and weddings. I was one of them and that was handy.
If the uniform should be there, to ensure it's not hostile, it may be:
Of basic rules. Formal dresses, dark under the waist line, white over it.
Civilian models, without a glimpse of cop/military details and ranks, insignias.
Common to everyone without any color differentiation (and requirements to buy it in exact shade of a color).
Rather cheap or even subsidized, shared from older to younger kids, because children are frequently growing out of them and it's a bummer to buy ten+ sets of dresses.
Context has a value, as it exists as a set of additional tokens, this means slower computing time and more resources. It is limited to some set amount to strike the balance between speed and quality. In a car specific assistant, I guess there is a hard part including chosen tone of responses, informing it about the owner, prioritising car-related things, and also some stored cache of recent conversations. I don't think it can dig deep enough into the past to find anything related to nudes, so I suppose the context itself may have an impact, but not in a direct line A to B.
Reproduction would be hard for that is a black box that got a series of auto-transcribed voice inputs from a family over their ride, none of them are recorded at the time and idk if that thing has user-accessible logs. Chances of getting this absurd response are very thin, and we don't even have the data. We can make another AI that would roll all variations of 'hello I am a minor let's talk soccer' to the Tesla assistant of relevant release until it triggers it again, but, well, it's seemingly close to miliions of monkey with typewriters at this point.
And what we would have then is, well, an obvious answer that training data obviously has garbage in it, just by it's sheer volume and randomness of the internet, and that it can sometimes reproduce said garbage.
But the question itself is more about what other commenters pointed out: we have AI shoveled down on us, but rarely even talk about it's safety. There were articles about people using these as a psychological self-help tool, we see them put into search engines and Windows, there's a lot going on with that tech marvel or bubble without anyone asking first if we are supposed to use it in different contexts the first place.
This weird anecdote about sexting chatbot opens the conversation from the traditional angle of whataboutkids(tm), and it is interesting how it would affect things, if it would.
I doubt it has enough context lenght for that, even if we suspect someone was watching nudes on car's display via Grok.
What is probable - is that somewhere beneath it had a data entry of soccer and nudity together, maybe even as an exact exchange between users (imagine horny boomer commenting under a random facebook post). I suppose that it got triggered by words "soccer" and "mom" appearing together in kid's speech, as this combination means middle-aged woman with kids, and that is also a less popular tag pointing at MILFs.
And it looked impressive in some biomes with natural disasters, but other than that it's miles and miles of (comfy?) desolation and boredom. If not for scattered remains of gameplay, it could've been it's own art thing.
In the age of social media, content has a strong boost of community participation. Those who pirated [x] talked about it and therefore added to the hype, gave incencitive for other to try it or buy it. After a month or so it's hard to hook anyone other than with big sales or updates.
I'd argue, that it sometimes adds complexity to an already fragile system. Like when we implement touchscreens instead of buttons in cars. It's akin to how Tesla, unlike Waymo, dropped LIDAR to depend on regular videoinputs alone. Direct control over systems without unreliable interfaces, semantic translation layer, computer vision dependancy etc serves the same tasks without additional risks and computational overheads.
LLM is what usually sold as AI nowadays. Convential ML is boring and too normal, not as exciting as a thing that processes your words and gives some responses, almost as if it's sentient. Nvidia couldn't come to it's current capitalization if we defaulted to useful models that can speed up technical process after some fine tuning by data scientists, like shaving off another 0.1% on Kaggle or IRL in a classification task. It usually causes big but still incremental changes. What is sold as AI and in what quality it fits into your original comment as a lifesaver is nothing short of reinvention of one's workplace or completely replacing the worker. That's hardly hapening anytime soon.
His name is so fitting for a satyrical military action figure.