Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
78
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I don't think anyone claimed what Israel is doing was fine. Even Biden was critical.

    When Ukraine surrendered their nuclear weapons the US promised to help protect them from Russia. It was our duty to help. To get the Ukraine funding passed it had to be bundled with assistance for Israel, or Republicans would not have voted for it.

  • Biden gave Ukraine $120 billion for defense against the invasion.

    He gave $18 billion to Israel and $2 billion to Gaza.

  • LLMs are a type of machine learning. Input is broken into tokens, which are then fed through a type of neural network called a transformer model.

    The models are trained with a process known as deep learning, which involves the probabilistic analysis of unstructured data, which eventually enables the model to recognize distinctions between pieces of content.

    That's like textbook machine learning. What you said about interpreting sentiment isn't wrong, but it does so with machine learning algorithms.

  • It's actually quite rare for crocodiles to eat capybaras, they have a mutually beneficial relationship. The primary predator of the capybara is the jaguar.

  • This article is about Gemini, not GPT. The generic term is LLM: Large Language Model.

  • Plans are in motion. See you at 50501 on Wednesday.

  • By my estimation, of those 126: 80 are a win for X (or whoever goes first), 30 are a win for O (or whoever goes second), and 16 are a stalemate.

    So the number of losing positions depends on whether you go first or second.

  • Good point. There's only 126 filled arrangements that are valid game states.

  • There are only like 500 losing tictac toe scenarios max.

    Three positions for each square (X, O, or blank), 9 squares: 3^9 = 19,683 possible game states.

    Of those there are only 512 combinations where the board is compete: 2^9 = 512

    Of those 512, only 16 combinations results in a win for either player. Meaning there are only 8 losing scenarios and 496 stalemate scenarios.

  • Make the chips in Guadalajara, ship them out of Puerto Vallarta to Vancouver to power server farms in Surrey; cut the US out entirely.

  • Hell, use the waste heat to power hot water heaters or something. It blows my mind that we don't do more cloud computing in cold environments. The servers produce heat, the people need heat, solve one problem with another. Instead we seem to be putting them in the driest and hottest climates available.

  • Idk, I like CSS, but I come from a web development background. Modern JS (ES4+) is fully capable of replacing CSS using the style property.

    JSX is sort of like a singular language to do all three.

    HTML isn't perfect, but I can't think of a better language for writing documents. TEX is unintuitive, PDF is opaque, markdown is just HTML shorthand.

  • Just use React or something, you can use a single syntax for all three. It makes total sense why the syntax is different if you think about when and why they were made. We had HTML for years before CSS, and it was longer still until we got JavaScript. Each language has a different purpose, so naturally a different syntax makes sense. Your hill is poorly defended.

  • GU24 is wack, especially for home lighting. I think they aren't made much anymore.

  • I agree with you, but I don't think that makes it a poor example; those different cables aren't competing standards, they're different types of USB-C cables. They should absolutely label the cables though, big oversight on the standard there.

  • Those aren't different standards, they're just different USB-C cables. It's like saying light bulb sockets aren't a unifying standard because there's different bulbs with different wattages. The fact that all those cables work over the same standard is an example of how ubiquitous the standard is. That said they should be labeled better, like how USB3 was color coded blue; each cable could have a color strip to distinguish it.

  • What do you mean? Do you have any examples?

  • Light bulb sockets are the same all over. RJ-45 Ethernet, USB-C, Bluetooth, WiFi, TCP, HTTP, HTML, CSS.

  • In/out groups are natural, but the establishment of those groups on 'racial' lines is totally constructed. The concept of race itself doesn't hold up to scrutiny, it's a fixation on specific phenotypic traits.

    Notice how racial bias is fixated on skin color while other phenotypic differences are largely ignored; people with different colored eyes or hair, different nose shapes, different hair textures, etc. 400 years ago skin tone was similarly trivial, but that changed with the rise of chattel slavery.