This is mostly consistent with what I've seen, but I would like to know more. Are there any books or articles on the topic, in particular how what is happening is like another attempt at the same plan now that most WWII vets and survivors are dying off/dead/otherwise incapacitated and so those who have the most reason to stop it from happening are much less likely to do so?
All good, i definitely hear you. If that ever changes i hope you know that this offer is ongoing. Anyways, Adventure Time is my go to recommendation for comfort content, it's like hundreds of episodes (plus comics and spin offs) of nearly 100% high quality good feel animation. So funny and with a really positive outlook overall. I've compared it to an epic poem told in a modern format before. Similarly I would recommend Steven Universe and The Owl House (oh and Bee & Puppycat) if you like cartoons like that at all. I have others too. Do you like stuff like that or what do you prefer?
Hey can I DM you? I have seen you around and I know you're going through a lot but if you want to talk to someone about this stuff who gets it please feel free to reach out, we can work on this stuff together :)
I mean... Are we also forgetting that Obama himself was not exactly the best president ever? If we're keeping any part of this system we probably don't want an establishment Democrat who bombed a LOT of people running the country when we need a transition away from regressive, non-people centered (aka non-solution focused, non-evidence based, non-need-meeting, etc) policy and systems to using methods that are responsible and effective and center harm reduction/prevention and meeting needs as priority goals and establishing a way of doing things that better represents (and identifies and acknowledges and strives to meet) the actual needs of people.
Okay. Have you tried looking elsewhere than a blog post that never claimed to be "the truth"?
Anyways that's a garbage argument. I'd like to know how you've been managing not to find anything opinion based in whatever corner of the internet you've come from. If you're only willing to see things that are anywhere near "the truth" you should be reading an academic publication, not social media.
That's not what misattributed means especially regarding a quote. It would be misattributed if they said someone else's name. Anyways how is it wrong (or whatever you meant) to say that what he's saying about an older version of similar tech is applicable to a newer iteration? Either way this isn't a news article, it's a blog post. Who cares if it's editorialized?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Council