Interesting point, but the middle part where they attack AI users is maybe a bit too long.
I definitely agree with the "when I find out its AI art I feel deflated" feeling. For me it is the lack of intentionality that makes current AI models worthless slop and stops it from being a proper tool, like the magic wand described in the post. No AI user can generate the same thing again. Thereby it is not their skill that created it, but random chance. What differentiates an artist is that intentionality. "If I put that paint stroke here, it will look like an eye brow" or "if I press that key for 4 seconds now, it will accentuate the following notes". When you can create parts of the artwork that intentional, then I agree that AI is a tool for artist. Before that it's just gambling and trying to present other peoples work (the training data) as your own.
Oh no worries, eastern religion need no double negative to be as shite as Christianity in regard of power imbalance and it's abuse.
I learned a while ago that Buddhism does have a hell as well, not permanent like in Christianity, but a hell nonetheless. And you know who is there and gets extra punished? Unbeliever! How convenient for the priests who get donations and can wield power from the believe the people place in them.
And recently I learned about, I think it was Hinduism or another Indian religion, that people needed to offer sacrifices to the temples in order to shorten the burden their recently deceased loved ones would need to endure. And it was explicitly stated in the museum that poorer people who couldn't sacrifice much or anything were directly told they are responsible for their loved ones prolonged suffering.
So don't feel bad about lumping all big religions together. I haven't yet seen a big one, that isn't shite and more about concentration of power instead of helping the people.