Well no, because we don't have a problem that blockchain solves (better than open software, if it must be digital), and there are loads of problems that the blockchain doesn't solve. Like how am I supposed to vote with that thing under no coercion.
That's very very optimistically. They won't care a shit. Who understands cryptography enough to be swayed over to the bad side anyways? And those who do understand it, will most probably know that even if technically it could work, it won't.
Well yeah, but my statement is true anyways IMO. Deep neural networks are unchanged since the eighties I guess, and again IMO it's not they who need/can have a breakthrough, doubly especially since nobody seems to be working on anything else than "bigger datasets" and profiling and such.
No it doesn't. It only works because 51% doesn't change the ledger.
You already have this with a simple database for ownership. It already exists, and ledgers made out of paper predates that.