Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
2
Comments
302
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Writing code with an LLM is often actually less productive than writing without.

    Sure for some small tasks it might poop out an answer real quick and it may look like something that's good. But it only looks like it, checking if it is actually good can be pretty hard. It is much harder to read and understand code, than it is to write it. And in cases where a single character is the difference between having a security issue and not having one, it's very hard to spot those mistakes. People who say they code faster with an LLM just blindly accept the given answer, maybe with a quick glance and some simple testing. Not in depth code review, which is hard and costs time.

    Then there's all the cases where the LLM messes up and doesn't give a good answer, even after repeated back and forth. Once the thing is stuck in an incorrect solution, it's very hard to get it out of there. Especially once the context window runs out, it becomes a nightmare after that. It will say something like "Summarizing conversation", which means it deletes lines from the conversation that are deemed superfluous, even if those are critical requirement descriptions.

    There's also the issue where an LLM simply can't do a large complex task. They've tried to fix this with agents and planning mode and such. Breaking everything down into smaller and smaller parts, so it can be handled. But with nothing keeping the overview of the mismatched set of nonsense it produces. Something a real coder is expected to handle just fine.

    The models are also always trained a while ago, which can be really annoying when working with something like Angular. There are frequent updates to Angular and those usually have breaking changes, updated best practices and can even be entire paradigm shifts. The AI simply doesn't know what to do with the new version, since it was trained before that. And it will spit out Stackoverflow answers from 2018, especially the ones with comments saying to never ever do that.

    There's also so much more to being a good software developer than just writing the code. The LLM can't do any of those other things, it can just write the code. And by not writing the code ourselves, we are losing an important part of the process. And that's a muscle that needs flexing, or skills rust and go away.

    And now they've poisoned the well, flooding the internet with AI slop and in doing so destroying it. Website traffic has gone up, but actual human visits have gone down. Good luck training new models on that garbage heap of data. Which might be fine for now, but as new versions of stuff gets released, the LLM will get more and more out of date.

  • No they will simply steal it, like they usually do.

  • Remember this is the generation that told their kids not to watch too much TV or it would turn their brains to mush. Well I guess they were right all along

  • Looks like the cat has trained you well

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • In theory yes, in practice we have absolutely no idea how to actually do that and use the energy in an efficient or practical way. Even just on paper without limitations of technology or costs, we have no idea. Physics simply isn't as clean or neat like that in real life.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I don't think we have the technology or will have the technology any time soon to send a focused enough powerful enough radio signal over 150 light years. As radio is subject to the inverse square law, the amount of power you'd need is gigantic. Like black hole swallowing a bunch of stars levels of energy. Iirc anything over 25 light years is pretty much a no-go for radio as the detectors get ridiculous and the signal to noise ratio makes it indistinguishable from background levels.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Oh only a billion tons of anti-matter. Good thing we've already made a few nanograms, so in a billion years or so we'll have plenty.

  • So imagine a bus...

  • No that's not right, it's about 1000 watts/m2 on the surface. But it is on a totally clear day with the sun directly overhead. So depending on your latitude you get less per m2 because the Earth is round.

    Wikipedia says it's 1361 watts per m2 just outside the atmosphere.

  • Ugh I hate those new suburbs with themed street names. They are always a maze and I get turned around in them. My mate Martin used to live in one of those where all of the streets were some variation of grass. We would be in the car and ask amongst ourselves: "Where does Martin live again? What was the street? Wasn't it grass something or other?". Only to get to that suburb and get really confused as all of those streets were named grass something and then we really couldn't remember.

    But back then before GPS was a common thing and before we had cellphones, we had a sort of vibe navigation system. Getting to the correct city was easy, even if you didn't know where it was, there would always be signs. But then when we got near our destination, you'd sorta drive in a direction that felt right. You'd be amazed how often we just found the right place like that. Only rarely did we have to check our navigation book tucked under the seat or fold out a big map on the dash. Never did we need to ask for directions, that simply wasn't done.

  • Wait is that Nicolas Locarno? Why is he in this picture with Janeway?

  • I'm not sure the energy to weight ratio of 80,000 pounds of batteries to 80,000 pounds of fuel is.

    Fuel is about 25 times more energy dense compared to batteries. Of course depending on the fuel and depending on the batteries. 25 times is most diesel fuels compared to most modern li-ion batteries. Large LiFePO4 would probably be used for transport, which do worse than high performance LiCoO2 batteries, so then you are talking about somewhere around 30 times worse. Transporting batteries simply isn't worth doing, it's super inefficient.

    Same with stuff like microwave transmission of power, you lose so much in the transfer, it's a total non starter.

  • The big enemy is transportation. You can put biofuel in a container and it will keep for a very long time. It's easy to ship anywhere you'd like in large quantities. It can be pumped around using pipelines, it can be put in ships, boats and fuel trucks and brought to just about anywhere. Even places that don't have permanent infrastructure can often easily be reached by truck and transport a huge amount of energy in one go. Those fuels are very energy dense, so transport is easy and cheap and it doesn't lose any energy from being transported.

    With electric energy transport is much harder, you need large transformer stations to get it up to high voltages and then you need fixed infrastructure to transport it anywhere. And on the receiving side you'd also need large stations to be able to use the energy and distribute it further. And every step loses energy, the conversion up to high voltage, the transport over the powerlines and then the conversion back down. Reaching places that don't have fixed infrastructure is much harder, as we don't have very good storage options for electrical energy. Best we can do is chemical storage in the form of large and heavy batteries that aren't as energy dense as biofuel.

    However solar has a trick up it's sleeve where it's super easy to generate the energy where you need it, reducing the need for transport. Different from other power generation options you don't need a whole lot to generate some energy. For a lot of homes simply putting solar panels on the roof is enough to generate a lot of power for the home itself and an electrical car. Putting solar in places we need energy is the trick to a sustainable future (although we need to fix some issues with solar, but it's pretty good as it is). Having a bit of biofuel as an alternative can be pretty handy though and is better than fossil fuels for sure.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Most of what is left after Jupiter is in Saturn and after that Neptune and Uranus take up a lot of the mass. The amount of mass in the small terrestrial planets, all of the moons, all of the asteroids etc. is less than 0.002% of the mass of the Solar system.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • And 0.1% is Jupiter, the other 0.04% is everything else...

  • No worries, they already showed how easily they can be replaced, so they probably won't get paid at all somewhere in the near future.

  • I think that's only lane departure warnings? Not active lane following

  • They've all but admitted they are pivoting to AI solutions and are pulling out of the car business. They want the stock market to treat them like a startup and invest heavily. And given the level of memery for even a memestock, it will probably somehow work.