Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

TheObviousSolution

@ TheObviousSolution @lemmy.ca

Posts
1
Comments
195
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • The dominoes are falling: motherboard sales down 50% as PC enthusiasts are put off by stinking memory prices

    Jump

  • Here's to hoping that it increases pressure to break the cartels and start getting the ball rolling on more independent foundries.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Try that while mixing modular PSU cables for some extra fireworks. This is like the old adage of the professional who pushes a button and justifies his pay because it isn't about how hard it is to push the button, it is knowing which button to push. Connecting cables is simple, but you have to know which ones you need to connect, which ones you need to skip, and which ones are likely to be having a problem.

  • oof

    Jump

  • It's a valid label, I don't even see it as particularly rude. The reason people go to school is literally a skill issue.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • Oh yeah, that backlash has totally stopped them from getting away with it, you are totally right.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • Your definition is useless to my concerns about AI, and you don't care about a discussion, you directly want to damn them - for using filler BS art that they made sure to remove and some promo? You want to throw them into the same lot as the same people vibe coding and generating a complete game out of AI, you do you. I just look at how they handle removing it and owning up to it after they use it. It's funny how flawed people who only tolerate perfection are versus the people who are capable of valuing people grow from their mistakes.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • Ask RAM prices. Maybe you missed the whole entire AI industry based off of pirated content now getting even Disney to pay them.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • They also included filler textures which they kept track off and replaced. Going so asinine on this making the whole game being used with generative AI makes the term worthless, if that's what people are hoping to accomplish.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • The game was not developed with generative AI. AI was used in promo and textures for a very limited time and then was substituted. If this is the war engine you are running, I want way off of it, my beef with modern AI is way different.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • So they lost because the promo material that seldom makes it into the game included AI this time around, for a very short while? Do you think that makes the people so judgemental look better?

  • Anti-Palestinian Billionaires Can Now Control What TikTok Users See

    Jump

  • Seems like that was always the end goal. Imperialist global power built on colonialism continues to push forward neocolonialism, more at 11.

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards

    Jump

  • Oh no, they used gen AI filler art which they immediately replaced with human one. They did it the one way they could do it right, let's demonize them into submission while the flagrant violators get away with murder because why bother?

    As someone who hates the AI bubble, this anti AI circlejerk is making me hate the circlejerk more than the bubble. Plan successful?

  • No good billionaires

    Jump

  • What a flawed argument. Mentally ill / drug addicts will always exist, so there will always be people like that. That's the fallback for people who want to dismiss poverty. This is divisive in a dumb way.

    "There are no good billionaires" not because of a picture of a homeless guy, but because how the position itself inherently requires screwing society and not giving back in return to hoard an unnatural amount of wealth. And the one that do try to give back would likely get demonized by the rest, as in troll factories in poor countries being financed to spread toxicity, so they can do their best at trying to avoid letting it become a trend.

    The moment people decided to shit on the parties that submit to oversight and investigations, even those that are basically manufactured from nothingburgers, over the parties that deflect and lie to a degree that's not even comparable while they get fed off intel from Palantir on how to keep manufacturing BS that best attacks their political opponents, is the moment democracy was lost.

  • Pam Bondi wants the government to create cash bounties for turning in trans equality activists - LGBTQ Nation

    Jump

  • They need to round up their boogeyman so they can make off like pirates with the property and wealth they appropriate from them to reward their lower hounds while they save up to buy the inevitable crash, Nazelectric Boogaloo 2.0

  • I like to travel

    Jump

  • So what if it is? Is his whole personality to be a judgemental prick? If you are in a conversation you find boring and this is the best you can do to try to move on, you probably are, no matter how right you are.

  • OpenAI says dead teen violated TOS when he used ChatGPT to plan suicide

    Jump

  • "Person violated the TOS when they used the magic lamp to make the genie do bad things."

    You still made the magic lamp and the genie capable of doing those bad things. That's the thing with intelligence, even the artificial variety. A chainsaw isn't going to get up and begin a chainsaw massacre just because you throw the right prompt injection at it. It may just reply with words, but words have power.

  • Good luck, everybody

    Jump

  • If only there were some device built into all cars to block out the sun and clean your windshield while driving!

  • The Correct Incantation

    Jump

  • Always check what your AI is telling you. After all, it's in the name: Avian, bird-brained.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • You are looking way too much, it's just an observation from a minority looking into popular American and international popular culture.

    You act like the term was niche and insignificant

    That's really not it. Look in the mirror, your insecurities are showing. Just because it is not popular in popular culture does not mean it is niche or insignificant. Reality is not a popularity contest, the only place popularity is important is in regards to general awareness.

    it wasn’t just a catch all term

    That implies that you admit it's a catch all term now, just that it's inception has been founded on -

    a dog whistle fog horn, aimed directly and minimizing the struggles of marginalized people

    True, but irrelevant in regards to why it has become popular (because it is a catch all term that now everyone is being exposed to). Dog whistles themselves don't become popular by themselves, most people are not aware of them precisely because they are not popular knowledge and are supposed to identify only those in the know. It came from the people who had a problem with the movements that used the term, but most MAGA members who know the term won't even know about its history. Hard disagree again.

    There are plenty of people in MAGA who don't know the origins of the term woke, just what it means now, and if you don't believe that, I don't know, have a tirade with the other people in the thread who have pointed it out. Those people have definitely been influenced by the people who have raged against these groups - they are in their social networks and are several degrees closer to the exposure of their propaganda but, as you even acknowledge, they are "aimed directly and minimizing the struggles of marginalized people; a declaration of being against exactly what the word had always meant in the first place". Most of MAGA are useful pawns of bigotry, hate, and selfishness to differing degrees, what mattered is that they enabled their objective, not dog whistle identification.

    But that also meant they made the term woke popular in popular culture as a result.

    And because MAGA is a mask for bigotry, hate, and selfishness, even though they may not know the history of the term and just use it as a label, they are still outing their bigotry, hatred, and selfishness. The very fact that most of them are outing what is behind the label makes the whole idea of using "anti-woke" as a dogwhistle meaningless - everyone, inside and outside their group, can identify their bigotry.

    there should be anyone playing defence for them ... plausible deniability, which you grant them wholesale.

    Who is? Sheesh, that's some Olympic grade mental gymnastics to accuse me of "playing defense" by just pointing out that MAGA has made the term popular when it wasn't before.

    So how does them making the term so popular that it outs them as bigots work into the term being a dog whistle? Because I'm going to have to say, I don't think you know what the meaning and use of a dog whistles is either if you are claiming this. Pointing out that they are bigots and that they themselves have been the cause for the popularity of the term that identifies as such is not "grant"ing "plausible deniability" - pretty bold strategy to claim that someone who identifies them as bigots is granting them plausible deniability by pointing out they themselves have now made the term that identifies them popular. When a dog whistle identifies both the people who know and the people who don't know of being the same thing, it is no longer a dog whistle.

    I have taken some verbal abuse elsewhere in the thread because this also made someone else insecure. In your case, I would say it is provoking something akin to a hyperimmune response.

  • Removed

    I Work For an Evil [Tech] Company, but Outside Work, I’m Actually a Really Good Person

    Jump

  • I don't know of anyone who isn't in some way contributing some way or form to some rather dystopian practices, intentionally or not. This is not a justification, just an observation. Just by being part of any society and filing your taxes people can be "working for evil".

    The real crux of the matter is what you consider acceptable evil. The people who tell themselves they don't accept any are usually the most intolerant. AI is a buzzword, but engineered intelligent systems are inevitable. We decide whether we want to let it be part of our society or whether we allow it to topple it. Either way, at the end of the day to most of us it won't really matter if at the top is a silicon mind or a meat one.