That's what I'm getting at. All the 'Bad Guys' who genuinely need the security to do bad things will just move to the other options, along with us tech savvy types. The only people they'll be able to spy on are the normies who aren't actually criminals...
Actually I think I get it now. I'm sure for many of them, it's not about catching criminals at all.
I wonder if they understand, it'll be impossible to truly stop this.Even if they get some of the low hanging fruit. People will just move to the more secure, distributed, and anonymous options.Or are they actually ignorant enough to believe this is something they can solve.
They aren't inherently good or bad.For the average person they tend to be fine.For critical business or governments who need their machines to operate 💯. It makes sense to manage their own, with cautious limited test rollouts and what not.
Did I defend him?Or did I point out the orders of magnitude difference. Not even mentioning that one sold books and a Netflix series after leaving office, while the other has literally solicited bribes and scammed his supporters with meme-coins, as well as selling shitty sneakers, and phones that won't ever be released, and more while still in office.
Absolutely disagreeSocial media is inherently public. Everything here should always be completely public. Nobody should ever think anything they do here is private at all.
My private social media is Signal. All my real world friends use it for our personal communications.
I say "laughing my ass off"