Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
345
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I mean, if you have a royal family, you're asking for this shit

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • What can be good about it that a normal relationship cannot provide?

    I can't imagine a single answer. Thus, "nothing good about it" seems accurate.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I mean, homeschooling can definitely cause that kind of issue.

    The difference being that there are good sides to it too, while there are no good sides coming from incest, and trying to equate the two seems a bit far fetched and incoherent.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It's more of a question of what is healthy psychologically. Staying to close to one group socially makes a sort of echo chamber, and that's always a problem.

    And that's what I mean with "weird shit", things like racism are quite known to be increased in people that are not in contact with people of color for example. Echo chambers are generally bad, and I feel like this would create a very strong one ("us against the world" and whatnot)

    DNA doesn't matter when it comes to kids if you don't have a background thought that is at least a bit problematic. It's not about what matters to them only, but also about what is morally wrong. This "DNA is everything" thing is extremely toxic

  • I mean, when you see most programmers, you want to believe it :)

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yeah, because no one racist ever tried to mix the concept of ancestry and geographical origin to imply the existence of races.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I did not call you racist, I was on the contrary pointing out that the only thing that can make it controversial is the wording.

    My point was, this is not a controversial take, but phrased badly it can sound like one, which is probably the reason people would end up calling you racist. Not because what you say (and especially what you mean) is racist, but because it can sound like a red flag.

    And I totally agree with the fact that the origin changes nothing to humans, or to racism, because nothing will ever prove racism to be right scientifically. I wasn't disagreeing with you, just commenting on the "controversial" aspect.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • If the two individuals aged for a significant part of their lives together, offsprings are not the only "harm".

    Forming relationships with people that are different (as in, not relatives) helps avoid the bad parts of the family structure (the weird beliefs, opinions, behaviours, etc, that are taught within a family but are not accepted outside of it). Without that, you can end up with something that seems like "cultural inbreeding" where the weirdness persists and grows, until it reaches weird shit.


    On a side note

    Arguably a similar effect already happens in western countries thanks to xenophobia, and that's why you have people that care so much about transmitting their DNA and having their own biological kids as if it mattered. This is just the remnants of a deeply racist culture that believes that you need to preserve your family line, and with it, your DNA. If people were mixing more with other cultures and origins, this would seem much more absurd.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I mean, it would be much less controversial to say "I believe that there are many unknown about the geographical origins of humans" and "our ancestors were not from Africa" (not exactly what you said, but exaggerated for clarity).

    One sounds like a generic question about prehistoric times, the other sounds like a racially charged propaganda piece.

    Sometimes things are about wording.

  • The question is more "considering the state of the world and the reality of computer programming job, should I consider becoming programmer" and the answer is no.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Unless it becomes very illegal to make hostile bots (which will never happen), the internet will be something only accessible through IDs and biometrics.

    Hell, if you will.

    1. Ask what was the purpose of the code
    2. Delete all the slop crap
    3. Make the code from scratch
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yes, if there are bullets or parts of metal that fly randomly, it is always going to be a hazard. Even without lead poisoning, I don't believe that chunks of metal in the digestive system would be good for this bird, or any other animal. And what is the point, what good does a stupid outdoors gun range bring? Even if you think that it's fine for people to learn how to be better at shooting deadly weapons, what does an outdoors setting bring other than risks?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yeah, it is a problem.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That's why I also mentioned to stop shooting guns. If you are shooting in such an unsafe way that fragments fly around and get lost, then you shouldn't be allowed to shoot in the first place.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I don't know, humans are good at diverging from their instincts when it comes to letting sick people die, but when it comes to killing less, they cannot anymore?

    I think that low-ass standards are what prevent humans from getting any better, if you start justifying mindless murders as "just instinct" then of course people will be fine with it. And funnily enough, that's one of the main arguments that hunters use, saying that they're just doing something "natural".

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • "Choose lead free ammunition"

    No?

    Just stop shooting guns and murdering things like a crazy ape?

  • Removed

    Dat Vegan Lyf #9

    Jump
  • It's not just the comics, the news communities are also suddenly getting a surge of articles with fascist undertones (if not full-on fascist tones) that weirdly get a lot of support. I noticed for example that suddenly there's a lot of articles talking positively of France, even though it is going extremely fast into fascism and has a president directly supporting nazis. A few months ago this would have never worked.

    The only places where this doesn't happen are the less popular communities, which also seems coherent with a bot attack.

  • Removed

    Dat Vegan Lyf #9

    Jump
  • Lemmy has a surprising amount of anti-vegan shit lately, especially in "humorous" communities.

    Is this a campaign by fascists to slowly get accepted here? It seems a lot like it and like it's working.