Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
345
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • It is not smart, it doesn't understand anything, it's just a random word generator and this insanity has to stop.

    How come people are so fucking dumb they can't accept the idea of animals being sentient, but then they get thrown a few words at their face and they suddenly decide to attribute sentience to the random word generator?

    What a stupid world we live in.

  • What are you talking about? A study showing that code made with the "help" of slop machines is worse in quality and contains more issues is unrelated to capitalism.

    If anything, people defending slop coding are the ones brainwashed by capitalism, with a cult of the "faster/more efficient" that makes them believe that code produced fast is good code no matter what.

    Hallucinatory slop has no place in the making of software, or anything else.

  • Ok cross the "on the edge of" AI psychosis, it's fully qualified psychosis.

  • Al studies that demonstrate the lack of use, and actually the negative impact of slop machines for coding are also delusional I guess.

  • You're just asking for more slop until the slop machine spits out slop vaguely shaped like what you want, and you attribute the machine an understanding of your instructions.

    AI doesn't learn, it doesn't understand, it doesn't correct, it doesn't reply. It just spits out words in an order that maximizes your engagement.

    People thinking that AIs can produce code are on the edge of AI psychosis.

  • You try to convince a mindless slop-machine to not produce slop? And then wonder why you still get slop?

  • Yes! People keep on thinking that they're so smart by saying "see, idiocracy was riiiight" when the movie basically tries to say that stupidity is hereditary, and that dumb people (understand: the sub-race) need to be eradicated through eugenics.

    That is such a nazi stance, and there's a gigantic amount of morons that don't see it and keep on screaming "idiocracyyyyy" anytime they can.

  • "No politics" always means "no minorities or leftism here"

  • Thanks for being the only useful comment here

  • Yeah, I forgot how easy it is to hide datacenters and massive data collection. Really, really hard to enforce, huh.

  • Ah yes, the reality that consists in giving up on all proper solutions out of being "down to earth", effectively solving nothing.

  • But licensing is trying to remove the water without doing anything about the hole. Or, best case situation, saying "we will fix the hole when the water is unmanageable, but for now we'll just try to empty it faster than it fills".

    If you ban LLMs, the problem will disappear. It's not like you can really hide a datacenter so easily, or the size of the data required. Anything less than that will do nothing

  • No, like banning LLMs.

  • Exactly, and that's where the problem lies and where something needs to be done.

  • We don't need to find ways to license something that shouldn't exist.

  • Poor nazi, he was only trying to do his job!

    It would be funny if it wasn't the current reality.

  • If the shelters have more money, they'll have more capacity as well.

    On top of that, nothing prevents people from adopting multiple pets or of taking care of them properly.

    People manage to pop kids endlessly and find ways to take care of them all day even if they have to go to work, they definitely can manage with pets too. They just don't give a shit.

  • Yeah ok, I don't want to know your stances on other various social subjects, if for you caring about another sentient being is "rigid and off-putting".

  • Which means that they're not waiting for you all day, as they have company