What are you talking about? A study showing that code made with the "help" of slop machines is worse in quality and contains more issues is unrelated to capitalism.
If anything, people defending slop coding are the ones brainwashed by capitalism, with a cult of the "faster/more efficient" that makes them believe that code produced fast is good code no matter what.
Hallucinatory slop has no place in the making of software, or anything else.
You're just asking for more slop until the slop machine spits out slop vaguely shaped like what you want, and you attribute the machine an understanding of your instructions.
AI doesn't learn, it doesn't understand, it doesn't correct, it doesn't reply. It just spits out words in an order that maximizes your engagement.
People thinking that AIs can produce code are on the edge of AI psychosis.
Yes! People keep on thinking that they're so smart by saying "see, idiocracy was riiiight" when the movie basically tries to say that stupidity is hereditary, and that dumb people (understand: the sub-race) need to be eradicated through eugenics.
That is such a nazi stance, and there's a gigantic amount of morons that don't see it and keep on screaming "idiocracyyyyy" anytime they can.
But licensing is trying to remove the water without doing anything about the hole. Or, best case situation, saying "we will fix the hole when the water is unmanageable, but for now we'll just try to empty it faster than it fills".
If you ban LLMs, the problem will disappear. It's not like you can really hide a datacenter so easily, or the size of the data required. Anything less than that will do nothing
If the shelters have more money, they'll have more capacity as well.
On top of that, nothing prevents people from adopting multiple pets or of taking care of them properly.
People manage to pop kids endlessly and find ways to take care of them all day even if they have to go to work, they definitely can manage with pets too. They just don't give a shit.
Yeah ok, I don't want to know your stances on other various social subjects, if for you caring about another sentient being is "rigid and off-putting".
That's not what puts off people from adopting. What puts them off is that they want the perfect, convenient, good-looking, cheapest option.
It's like saying that people don't adopt kids because they don't feel perfect enough; no, they don't do it because there's an easier, cheaper alternative, where they don't have to prove that they are good enough to take care of a kid beforehand. And that's why they just keep on popping kids in an overpopulated world.
You don't have to be perfect, but not making a social animal spend most of the day alone is a basic requirement.
On top of that, if you have the money to adopt and take care of a cat, but not the possibility of taking care of them properly, nothing prevents you from using this money to support a shelter or equivalent, which will in the end also take in stray cats.
But people don't want that because they care about themselves first, and want to get something from it first. They want a pet, and then they'll think about their wellbeing later, if it's not too inconvenient. And that's the mentality that leads to stray cats, dogs, and whatnot.
People don't have pets to help innocent creatures. They have pets to have a nice company that depends on them and will make them feel good after a long day of work, and they don't really care about anything else. As long as you don't change that, that's how you get people that get annoyed with their dogs and drop them on the side of the road, because they just don't get as much benefit from it as before.
Tldr: as long as you treat animals carelessly, people will be careless about them.
I really like people trying to be smart here by showing they don't give a shit about their pets.
If you can't have more than one pet, and cannot be most of the day with him, then yeah, don't get a pet. Just like you shouldn't have a kid if you spend 12+ hours per day away from them. That's basic, common sense.
The fact that you don't care about animal well-being, not even of your own pets that are depending fully on you, isn't something that you should be sassy about.
Maybe ask yourself why you felt the need to defend animal abuse, no?
What are you talking about? A study showing that code made with the "help" of slop machines is worse in quality and contains more issues is unrelated to capitalism.
If anything, people defending slop coding are the ones brainwashed by capitalism, with a cult of the "faster/more efficient" that makes them believe that code produced fast is good code no matter what.
Hallucinatory slop has no place in the making of software, or anything else.