Perhaps, but I was talking in a more general sense, I assume most of the "targets" of these "services" were not Nazis. Also the law usually has little to do with morality and justice.
(It also raises the question, is it moral to sell fake nazi murders?)
A blog that has been attempting to dox the archive.is owner. The ddos doesn't seem to be very successful either, given it's hosted by wordpress.com, who don't bill based on bandwidth, that isn't surprising. The whole situation seems pretty stupid tbh.
Most jurisdictions require intentionality for it to be a crime.
The commercial restrictions mean this license does not meet the open source hardware definition, one that was signed by a RepRap developer called Josef Pruša. https://freedomdefined.org/OSHW
I guess I should have qualified it as no significant conflicts. They were all small regional conflicts, deliberately contained in scope and duration.