Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
3
Comments
816
Joined
2 yr. ago

I can be controversial or annoying because I always require proof and facts for whatever people are saying/claiming. This has gotten me into a lot of heated debates, even got myself banned from "YouShouldKnow" for saying I need more proof of Israeli's genocide (that was long ago, got more proof and changed my mind). If I do not agree on some subjectively obvious topic, please do not assume I'm being unfriendly, evil or a troll. I do try my best to approach any subject with neutral and open mind. Just call me autistic with OCD

  • Yeah, I strongly disagree. It's a genuinely valid way to figure out someone better. While the tests and all that aren't really standardized, the idea is quite clear, and the idea works. Just because it was made mainstream, does not mean it's suddenly bad. Just because the origins are sketchy, does not mean the theory is invalid. It just essentially means one's ability to objectively assess your own and other's emotions, feel empathy (not just understand it, but feel it), low emotional intelligence people would be less rational about their own and everyone's else's emotions. You simply cannot argue against this. It's a skill/mechanism that makes society function better.

  • I genuinely don't understand your argument. Are you saying it's not a valid measurement system because humans came up with it? Just like everything else? What is your actual argument against emotional Intelligence as a metric besides that it was created by someone you don't like?

  • Nobody was talking about 'emotional intelligence' 5 years ago in popular culture. Now it's ubiquitous.

    This is so incredibly false. Just look at the google trends. In 2004 it's popularity was similar to that of 5 years ago, and even back in my teenager years I constantly heard it around and was part of studies.

    I don't understand what does actual buzzwords have to do with measurement system. They pretty much never go away just like IQ.

  • The cobbler's children have no shoes

  • Everything can be a buzzword if it doesn't directly apply to a selfish person with low EQ

  • The law is kinda weak. You really only need to slightly modify it for it to be copyrightable. No one really pushes full ChatGPT outputs as production code, and so it's safe to assume code can almost always be copyrighted, as long as you did something yourself

  • To be fair, it has been quite clear that the LLMs will move beyond language ever since we figured out how to train tools. LLM is essentially a method of machine learning and execution, but it's not limited to language. The output can be commands uninterpretable by human eyes.

    EDIT: Interestingly enough, only today I learned Llama can communicate more efficiently between themselves; https://youtu.be/EtNagNezo8w?is=cI0osETPI5FbQ08s

  • Im not sure how that cancels out what they said. One of their first models said "I'm ChatGPT" when asked who are you and it was rumored they used OpenAI model outputs for training.

  • Removed

    Jackpot

    Jump
  • lesser known, but imo iZombie was a fun one too

  • Didn't he offer money directly to voters at some point?

  • The fact that we call property owners "landlords"

  • Probably starts with https://

  • I thought I was cool

  • Right, but why are you ready to live green when 8 out of 10 people would take the cheaper oil that you didn't buy? Just keep doing whatever you like, we don't matter on the grand scheme of things.

  • You're confused.

    The money comes from you. I welcome you to no longer use a car and walk to the job. Poof, suddenly their profit falls. Multiply that by a society, and suddenly much of these firms can no longer exist.

    The question has always been about how much humans are willing to sacrifice to save the earth, and the answer has pretty much always been "best I can do is blame a placeholder (some CEO/company, doesn't matter which one, because it's just demand from society and there will always be new companies as long as there is demand from you and me) and assume it's 100% their fault"

    Don't get me wrong, this isn't really an individual problem, it's how society/humans work. We'd vote for someone who speaks against oil, but hang them as soon as the oil price goes above 5$

  • Whenever I see posts like this, I really don't understand if people really think they produce oil/gas/fuel/food packaging, etc. for themselves.

    If someone offers a money for a product, there will be someone else willing to sell it to you. You are the consumer.

    Think of it like this - a electricity company generates electricity, as much as it's needed for current demand. I'm the final consumer, the demander, the reason infrastructure exists. And I shall be happy burning my RTX 5080 while looking into ACs to cool the room from that PC at the same time, hitting 2kW usage just so I can do nothing and game, because who cares. I tried living green, but when you see MFs producing more footprint in their shitty trucks in a day than you do in a month using Ebike, and people still decide to blame some placeholder instead of our own society and way of living, then it's quite clear nothing will change and it's a lost cause.

  • Points at a giant fireball above our heads

  • I genuinely don't understand their play, especially google with nearly 100b in stocks. It was known that SpaceX opening stock price was overvalued, so statistically there is a far better chance of it going down than up once the trading starts. It's been steadily going down ever since launch as expected. If they think SpaceX will accomplish some breakthru in the long term, then why buy at start instead of when it pretty much stabilizes

    I know I don't have any insider info, I'm not trading guru and I'm probably missing something here, but it's just weird to me

  • Step 1: Go to a richer country for work

    Step 2: Sell everything you don't need, take a loan

    Step 3: Use the money to buy out rentable private property (preferablly from government to get rid of cheap housing, aka. anti-socialism)

    Step 4: Push for highest possible rent someone is ready to pay

    Step 5: Repeat till satisfied

    Step 6: Lay back and watch the news in peace about how there's property crisis, rent is skyrocketing and how 1/3 of the workforce isn't doing anything. Then talk about how much capitalism sucks.

    I know many people who do this. Seems to work.

  • Science Memes @mander.xyz

    Correlation implies causation

  • Science Memes @mander.xyz

    Nope, not visiting that

  • Reddit @lemmy.world

    State of reddit comments in 2025