If you know any women in your life, which I assume by your comment you don't or they don't talk to you anymore, ask them when the last time they were sexually harassed.
The fact it might have literally been yesterday shouldn't be shocking to you.
Plus, I've never used a ride share before but if you say as a client "I identify as a woman", and a female driver shows up to pickup another 'female' client and it's obviously a group of dudes, couldn't she flag them as false information?
Also not trying to trans shame, I'm literally married to a trans person.
And that Wikipedia is not appropriate as a source to cite.
That's why you use Wikipedia as means of sourcing the citations. You look up an article, learn about it through Wiki, then further educate yourself on the topic through the citations.
You could totally fail as a parent but if firearm manufacturers were giving out free guns in front of a Wal Mart, and your already suicidal kid was just handed a loaded weapon, I'd sue the manufacturers for contributing to it.
When an AI encourages you to kill yourself literally for just talking to it, I'd sue the AI company.
Canada has a major example of encouragement of suicide from an outside source. Dude served 6 years for it (which still pisses me off as a Canadian and advocate for suicide prevention). What makes an AI any different?
