You really called me pro-genocide because I said you should be careful justifying "consequences", and you're out here advocating BUTCHERING women and children.
I'm not commenting on all the bait. Most of that is you arguing with an imaginary person in your head. Hurting innocent people is bad. Fuck Hamas and IDF. Take from that whatever you want.
But this is funny.
Yeah so did the Germans in World War II. That's a wonderful argument you're making. 🤦
It's like you ALMOST got what I was saying. But you're so wrapped up in yourself that you missed where I was saying genocide is bad.
Literally giving aid to Palestinians or threatening to stop funding Israel is seen as helping the aggressor protect itself from the consequences of their actions. Pretty straightforward. A lot of people see all the genocide as 100% justified.
Hamas did some really brutal shit. That doesn't justify murdering people.
If Dems are trying to act progressive, it's only in relation to Republicans.
I think most Dems try to appeal to actual conservative values. It's non-intrusive, light on protections, nothing that might make the average voter uncomfortable (no reparations, no medicaid for all, no major police reform etc). They're pretty vocal about it. It's just that their opposition is fucking terrorists that hate most of their own country.
Condemned antisemitism in the wake of a the Boulder, Colorado attack and expressed gratitude to all law enforcement, including ICE (explicitly).
Im guessing many of them were indifferent about the verbiage singling ICE or they didn't want to be against the condemnation and gratitude in spite of it.
I don't support war crimes. But I'm seeing it on this thread unfortunately.