Skip Navigation

OBJECTION!

@ Objection @lemmy.ml

Posts
2
Comments
1247
Joined
2 yr. ago

If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they're lying.

Evidence or GTFO.

  • Dems Reportedly Angry That Progressives Are Pushing Them to Act Like an Opposition Party.

    Jump

  • The US has been going all-in on hard power while soft power declines. There's a lot of rich individuals who benefit from military contracts but don't care as much about actually maintaining the empire. The big risk is that Americans are going to recognize this disparity and start WWIII in an effort to leverage the one area that the US has an advantage to retain hegemony.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • I know her positions. The point is that you haven't said a word defending her based on those positions or any other relevant quality. All you can say in her defense is that her positions aren't illegal to hold and that she's a minority. That's literally it.

    By the way, I still haven't heard you say that the Democrats should've been more hawkish in the Middle East like Tulsi wanted, so I assume you're aware that you're full of shit.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • You haven't said a word about her positions or what she said.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • I like dying by gunshot more than dying by electrocution.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • Your best defense is, "She is free to speak on the point of view that you don’t like," which is another way of saying, "The things she's said aren't illegal." That, and, "If you don't like her you're a racist and sexist." Absolutely pathetic, lazy, and stupid arguments.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • Lol, right. So when she was still calling herself a democrat and went on Fox News as far back as 2015 to shit talk Obama for not being hawkish enough in the Middle East, did the democrats "push her" to do that? How, exactly? Say it, that you think the democrats should've been more hawkish like Tulsi wanted.

    Oh, but you can't, can you? Because she flip flopped into pretending to be an isolationist, as soon as it was convenient. And suckers like you eat it up hook, line, and sinker.

    Of course you'd also like RFK. If you buy into one insincere opportunist grifter who believes in nothing, why not another?

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • Wouldn't they be legally liable for that unless they can prove it in court?

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • Lol. I'm sure you're playing those cards in good faith.

    It couldn't have anything to do with her politics or the fact that she's an opportunist with no principles who flipped to the right as soon as it was personally advantageous for her. Nope, every single Democrat, including those who are women, racial minorities, or female racial minorities, could only possibly dislike her because of racism and sexism 🙄

    God I hate Tulcels.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • And everyone else is free to criticize her, even if that's a point of view you don't like.

    If your best defense of her is, "The things she's said aren't illegal," that's not exactly a high bar.

  • Senate confirms Tulsi Gabbard as Trump’s director of national intelligence

    Jump

  • Turns out when you opportunistically betray your party and join the other side, you tend to alienate the party you were with before! Who knew?

    Have we finally solved the mystery of why people dislike former revolutionary war general Benedict Arnold?

  • Dem derails Marjorie Taylor Greene's 'DOGE' hearing with photo of 'President Elon Musk'

    Jump

  • If he starts touching rich people's assets he's gonna piss off every powerful person in the country, ideology be damned.

  • Removed

    Is it moral to vandalize Teslas?

    Jump

  • Writing something in dust is fine and if you think otherwise you're a nerd. Who gives a shit, just wipe it off.

    Going beyond that, I wouldn't. What, am I gonna target every car with a Trump sticker too? If you're gonna fuck with cars you should target gas guzzlers, not EVs. I'll absolutely judge someone for owning a cybertruck, but I'd rather let it break down on its own so they blame Musk instead of me.

  • 'He's Building a Concentration Camp': Fears Grow as Images Emerge of Offshore Prison at Gitmo.

    Jump

  • 90 senators, including Bernie Sanders, rejected Obama's 2009 funding proposal that would've closed the camp. And with good reason. Obama's move would've simply moved the prison onshore while continuing the indefinite detention without trial, potentially legitimizing the practice further and providing a clearer legal precedent.

    Yes, he technically tried to "close Guantanamo Bay" but in a way that wouldn't adress the actual reasons people want it closed.

    Sanders' statement:

    “A number of important questions remain unanswered regarding the rather complicated issue of not just how you close down the facility, but what you do with the prisoners,” he said in part. “In order to answer these questions, President Obama has appointed a high-level committee of top administration officials who will be issuing a report in the coming months. I think that it is prudent to review that plan they develop before we spend $80 million in taxpayer money.”

  • Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe

    Jump

  • This thing I don’t understand

    What don't I understand about it?

    I will refuse to believe any evidence to the contrary

    There is no evidence to the contrary. The only way there could be would be if they got caught.

    Plus I just happe to know you’re already conservative from your other posts so it’s just more evidence to back it up.

    Lmao of course you do.

    As I always say, "If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying." Please cite any evidence at all that I'm conservative.

    I apologize for my mistake earlier, when I said my suspicions about Anonymous were more reasonable than your belief that I'm a Russian bot, what I should've said is that they're more reasonable than your baseless and unfalsifiable belief that I'm secretly a conservative. Huge difference.

  • Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe

    Jump

  • Lmao, "conservative conspiracy hole." I guess "being suspicious of anonymous sources" makes me a conservative conspiracy theorist, somehow 🤣

    This is just basic critical thinking lol.

  • Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe

    Jump

  • In this case? Yeah, probably. If there was proof of their identity they would no longer be anonymous, would they?

    It's a much more reasonable assumption than how your lot assumes anyone who disagrees with you for any reason is a Russian bot, and can't be convinced by any amount of proof otherwise.

  • Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe

    Jump

  • Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe

    Jump

  • Anytime I see something about "Anonymous" I just assume it's some kind of fed psyop until proven otherwise.

  • Am I wrong for feeling cringe and ickiness when looking at my country flag?

    Jump

  • No, you've started to see things more clearly.