He's not totally wrong in the first one. You can buy phones that are more ethically produced than Apple ones. There is a choice to get something better, even if it's not perfect. In the second one there is no choice to get a different one, but there is a choice not to buy one at all. In the third one there is no choice in any way.
What do you think it's saying? I'm assuming it's that the guy is using a flawed argument in situations that make it increasingly obvious, with the third one being utterly ridiculous that he thinks it's a gotcha.
It's not that bad yet. FF works on pretty much any site that's not demonstrating some sort of bleeding edge fuckery. I haven't seen a "best viewed in Chrome" for a decade or two.
Hopefully this sort of enshittification will drive more people to use other browsers.
I think when you have an elderly cat, you have to just concentrate on what will give her the best quality of life for however long she has left. In our case the root cause of the ear problem that caused the scratching and the hematoma was never found because we felt that subjecting an elderly cat to an operation would cause her more stress than just living with it. The vet gave her antibiotics and pain killers, and put her on a low dose of steroids that she took for the rest of her life. The hematoma turned into fibrosis and although it looked horrible, the ear stopped bothering her once she got used to it.
With hindsight it was 100% the right decision, and she lived her best life for another 18 months, right up to the last day.
Bless her. We had an elderly cat with an ear like that. It looked horrible but it didn't bother her, so we didn't put her through the stress of operating on it.
It's the same point but my interpretation makes more sense. You don't need a 4 panel comic for a simple criticism of ad hominem.