Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
8
Comments
78
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • being fit becomes a way to signal discipline, long-term planning, a healthy lifestyle, competence, and so on.

    Yeah but I think it'll just be a more explicit marker of wealth instead, sort of how so much of fashion boils down to "how much are you willing to spend?"

  • This really just seems like "I want to complain about .ml" with extra steps.

    I don't care for them, so I don't go there.

    Open source projects will be used for things of which you approve and of which you do not, that is life.

  • Fyi, what's happening in LA is a much more trumpian distraction; it'll suck up all the media oxygen, it's an (possibly the only, if iirc) issue (immigration) on which he not only has overwhelming Republican support but ALSO a net favourable rating with the public overall.

  • Oh yeah, he's absolutely trolling and doing so delightfully.

  • Ehhhh, trump's incredibly successful modus operandi for distraction is to bait the Left into over-reacting etc. Epstein is actually important to a swathe of his voters (as is, I assume the respect of one of the wealthiest men on Earth.)

    If trump wanted a distraction, he'd sifn another ED targetting trans folks or somesuch in a way to make the Left freak out so that the fight becomes about that/our over reaction depending on your pov.

  • I was 34. But maybe a late emotional developer?

  • It's funny, I was pretty much in your shoes (who cries at imaginary people?) For most things. Then covid hit, something flipped and damn, I'm pretty sure I've had tears in more movies in the last 3 years than the 30 before that.

  • Well yeah, it's not like you'd have a choice. She does not allow insubordination.

  • How on Earth is this irrational? Why would they charge less than the maximum the market will bear? The paper is literally the Economist.

  • My folks have done this maybe 10 times without issue. There are whole websites etc, happy to pass on the one my parents used if you'd like. (I'd have ti ask etc or I'd just share it.)

  • If chatgpt is good enough for American foreign policy, it should be good enough for the law!

  • "But it's borrrrrrring when it's not an election! What, you want me to show up to vote in the primaries too? What are you, some kinda fascist make me vote guy?"

  • It was going to be announced at his retirement party on Monday... You know the dev likes surprises.

  • Honestly, a lot of days make me feel satisfied. I work on the comp side of a fundraising department for a large public university. I'm good at what I do, enjoy it and have earned enough of a reputation that people generally let me tackle whatever comes my way however I want.

    So, if I have a good productive day, I feel like maybe more students got scholarships because of my work that day. And I work from home so if I did well at work, found time to do my "old man refuses to stop playing sports with kids in their 20s" exercises AND had a couple good homecooked meals, well yeah, I feel pretty accomplished and satisfied.

    But yeah, doing something I like for a cause which I ferverently support, I have more good days than bad. Working from home is a heck of a cherry on top though.

  • I've wondered and never thought to ask. Thanks, the resulting conversation has been awesome.

  • Utilitarianism makes sense from first principles, Kant is just his opinions.

  • It's act vs rule ethics, what is ethical in a particular situation may not be broadly applicable to society.

    Edit: And from the religious parents perspective, letting your beloved child suffer an eternity of torment is probably not super moral. I may disagree but that's their perspective and there's no arbiter make the call.

  • I think that's the ethical answer too.

    We can't know who is right, so I don't see any ethical way to intervene.

    I hate when I see parents giving their kids a screen instead of interacting with them or worse, ignoring their kid im favour of their phone. But again, I don't feel it is ethical to interfere.

  • Their kid, their call up until the point the child's safety is in danger.

    I have no more right to tell them how to raise their kids than they have about my entirely hypothetical and undesired kids. I may not agree with their choices and they may not agree with mine, I may think they are raising their kids to be less moral, they may think the same with the added bonus that I'm condemning mine to an eternity of torment.

    That's life in a pluralistic society.