the bourgeois are not the enemy - it's the hyper capitalists
Yes, the bourgeois. Bourgeois means business owners or people who own capital.
Not sure exactly what you're meaning by "middle class", but I'm guessing it's white collar workers (people who's job is telling other people what to do) and/or "petite bourgeois" (aka small business owners like small tradie businesses or mum and pop shops).
the fediverse is too complex to free people from centralized stuff
Not really, people understood email just fine, and fediverse isn't that different. The problem is there's a major subtle push to make anything open source look way more complex than it is. It's basically an open secret that microsoft did this with linux, and I'd be shocked if social media companies aren't doing the same.
it's extremely biased towards leftism
That's inevitable. Anything foss will appeal far more to the anti corporate/ anti capitalist leftist people.
I don't agree that the concept of "winning an argument" should exist, at least in most cases. Arguments should be a cooperative thing, where you're working together to come to a point that you both agree on. Treating it as something that one person wins and the other loses removes all the learning that could happen.
That said, there are times when one person refuses to cooperate. At that point, I try to learn about their position as much as I can, and if there's a potential audience like in a comment section, I'll say my piece then leave.
This is from someone who got married in January this year.
The main part of marriage is the commitment to always choose to love your partner. To clarify, I'm using the word 'love' here as meaning "want what they want, and always do what's best for them regardless of the cost to yourself". You're promising to always be the first person they can count on, no matter what happens. It's not a promise to always like them, although that definitely helps and it's difficult not to when there's mutual love.
And for those that believe in this, marriage is an example of the love between God and his people.
Sure, the legal part exists, and I'd say it can sometimes be a good thing, but I don't see that as core to a marriage. Really, if you both agree to be committed to loving each other forever, I'd say you're married in the way that really matters.
Done that before pretty much. It's not hard. Use a bowline or some other loop knot to make a pulley between the loop and the anchor point, then go back and forth until you run out of rope, then tie it off.
Sure, ratchet tie downs are easier and probably get a tighter hold, but rope works fine.
In short, volcanoes. The town in built next to a lake. The biggest lake in the country. The lake is a caldera crater, from one of the biggest volcanic eruptions ever that we know of. And fun fact, it's still slightly active, and several hundred years overdue.
I'd say both. Sci fi means there are elements that the story pretends could be possible, which includes time travel (probably not the tardis, but most other methods), space travel, and most alien races probably including one's like the daleks and cybermen. Fantasy means there are things that the story fully admits are not possible in our world, which covers time lord regeneration.
There's plenty of other things that are both sci fi and fantasy: star wars, warhammer 40k, and marvel or dc superheroes.
I feel offended, disgusted, and entirely unsurprised. While this is probably the most blatant example of him blaspheming, it's very far from the first. Even on top of that, him and all the other nationalists that work with him have been dragging God's name through the mud for ages, really from long before Trump started politics. I can't say for sure if they believe God exists or not, but they sure aren't following him.
For context: I'm not American, but I'm very much Christian.
When Charlie Kirk died my attitude was "I'm glad he's stopped doing what he was doing, but I'm sad that it took him dying for that to happen". My attitude with Trump will likely be similar.
Assuming both use on board combustion engines, yes. But a train connected to a majority green energy power grid is probably more carbon efficient than most boats.
the reason they're kicked out is so that they don't eat from the immortality tree
I said that having eaten from the tree of good and evil put them in a state that humans were not designed to be in, so by kicking them out God is basically saying "it's better for them to die than it is for them to live forever like this"
Yes, the bourgeois. Bourgeois means business owners or people who own capital.
Not sure exactly what you're meaning by "middle class", but I'm guessing it's white collar workers (people who's job is telling other people what to do) and/or "petite bourgeois" (aka small business owners like small tradie businesses or mum and pop shops).