I'm well aware. It's so brutal that saying it's barbaric is unfair to barbarians. Fortunately for her, Florida wasn't on that list. In the terrible past, a woman could say "I'll kill myself if I have to continue this pregnancy," which would allow the doctor to act to save her life. In the more-terrible present, the draconian laws are written to prevent any such acts of humanity. The thumb is pushing so hard on the scale towards the "baby" rather than the woman (who has no value except as a mother) that the laws are indeed poorly written, on purpose.
Clearly the AI needs to be trained to answer that the CEOs should be fired. They cost the most and contribute the least, especially since they have shown they're replaceable with AI.
What I meant was not that she was allowed to get it, of course the law was written to allow a bare minimum of protection for the life of the mother. And I have edited because I should have said hesitant rather than unwilling. They did give her the pills.
My point was that she chose not to die for her beliefs, but instead carved out a nonsensical mental exception for herself by denying that the abortion was an abortion. When push came to shove, she chose to have her fetus (embryo? I bet she lied about it only being 5 weeks) killed instead of letting it die naturally and probably kill her in the process.
Which, by the way, is the only sane decision and yet it's the one she denies.
Let's at least put quotemarks around "baby," which is not accurate, but acceptable usage here because it's what she would have called it while pushing for the 6-week limit. What she aborted was a fetus, as it would be for any woman.
She had an ectopic pregnancy. That's why she needed an abortion, which she got (because it's okay when it's for me) but she's complaining about the fact that fear of prosecution under HER law made pharmacies unwilling (edit: I should have said "hesitant") to provide the necessary pills. It's the fact that it wasn't in her uterus that she's using to claim it "wasn't an abortion."
If this is your kitty, please consider getting a cat collar with a breakaway clasp. They're used to not being able to remove it so they probably won't, and it doesn't have to be easy. It just needs to unclasp before the number of pounds your kitty weighs, so if it catches on something when they're mid-leap they won't hang and strangle. If this collar has a breakaway that's just not obvious in this shot, I'm glad to be wrong.
Since he never confessed and they didn't have enough evidence to prove he'd murdered anyone other than the original 3 he'd served his time for, I think he should be called an "alleged" serial killer. The article even mentions other murders while he was jailed, and possible SS tactics during interrogation. Poggi's starting to look like just another bad cop to me.
Are we 100% sure of Poggi's whereabouts during the murders? Strangling your patsy and getting a light sentence would be a nifty tactic....
I think they mean that, as long as it doesn't exist, they can use the kind that does both, but as soon as it does, their boss will insist they use the boring kind.
Maybe that's just a parental guardian face. It's a kitten after all. Kittens are just leaping puppies with extra-sharp pointys. And the dog is on a comfy bed.
Hey now, he's still a baby really. He has almost all of his letters and he can read "the." You sit down with him and read a story out loud, running your finger under the words, and stop to let him read all the "the"s. Maybe help him sound out a few other words as well. Try a Richard Scarry book, there's usually at least one kitty just like him in there.
Read the room, son! Like, I'm a nonviolent old lady and even I felt a momentary impulse to throw wrenches at blind people. Lotta lemmings with even more impulsivity than me.
So the reason they're mad is that if they want it to pass they'll have to stay in Washington for the next 10 days and not go back on vacation? That tracks.
I'm well aware. It's so brutal that saying it's barbaric is unfair to barbarians. Fortunately for her, Florida wasn't on that list. In the terrible past, a woman could say "I'll kill myself if I have to continue this pregnancy," which would allow the doctor to act to save her life. In the more-terrible present, the draconian laws are written to prevent any such acts of humanity. The thumb is pushing so hard on the scale towards the "baby" rather than the woman (who has no value except as a mother) that the laws are indeed poorly written, on purpose.