Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
1701
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The reactors have all kinds of uses... at one point I worked for a company that wanted to manufacture Co60 for medical purposes (radiotherapy for cancer treatment) - and you use the exact same reactors, just load them with different reaction material to get your desired isotopes produced.

  • The difference between those concrete facts they're openly concerned about and the between-the-lines concerns they are not stating is: those other concerns are a matter of observation, recollection, testimony in court - and they can't have objective evidence disagreeing with their own testimony as to what may or may not have transpired within their "controlled areas."

  • proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released

    All semi-valid concerns. Is anybody else smothering from the overwhelming mass of concerns between-the-lines here?

  • IDK, about 5% of my nerdy co-workers wear them, and even though heavy-rimmed glasses look kinda-normal on them, it wasn't 90 seconds before I noticed all the new lenses peeking out of the frames - and once you see that it's impossible to un-see that, find yourself "flagging" everyone who is wearing them.

  • Unfortunately, the open source alternatives will only be permitted to reach market at prices of $1000 and up.

  • I was going to say: the Chi of the cat overpowers the Chi of the toast. While buttered toast may be strong enough to influence its own destiny during a fall (and I would suspect it's the butter on the toast doing that...), the cat is an altogether much stronger master of its destiny during the fall and whatever weak influence the butter on the toast has would be overpowered by the life-force of the cat.

  • Like a cell phone in a shirt pocket?

  • I did "recon drones" back in 2010... of course they lept at the opportunity to demonstrate kamakazi delivery of explosives with the platform to the Army too...

  • One facility publicly stated they're making "submarine fuel" - but that's pretty thin... same facility can easily make all kinds of fissile material as well.

  • Not everywhere yet, but there are growing regulations and outright bans of e-bikes across US municipalities.

  • How long without dialysis before you don't use any gasoline at all?

    Remember the anti-COVID vaccination push?

  • Poverty solved! Just don't be poor.

  • And, let's all return to the office while we're driving less, right?

  • I don't know - in my field there's a lot of "knowledge work" to be done, and if AI helps get it done faster...

    Think of the ditch digging crews with shovels, do you think any of the ex-shovel jockeys feel bad that they've been mostly "replaced" with backhoes and tracked excavators?

  • In my generation it was the nuclear industry (immediately post TMI & Chernobyl) which was giving away the huge incentive bonuses and premium salaries. I never filled out the Navy application - though I hear they paid the best overall. I did interview twice (nothing better to do at the time), got two offers, declined both, ultimately took lower paying jobs that I didn't mind the idea of going to work at.

  • also live their lives in such a way that collecting any actual money from such judgements is exceptionally difficult. Again, making court a waste of time and energy.

    “Only poor people commit crime or injure others.” Nope.

    You don’t have to be poor, you just have to have your assets legally protected from seizure via civil judgement. Cross the wrong line in the woods and a wildlife officer can confiscate your boat and the truck and trailer you brought it in on. Do all kinds of terrible things ending up in judgements of virtually any amount, and if your primary residence is a million dollar mansion, the courts can’t touch it. I rented a room in a very nice compound while at University, paid $400 per month to the landlord who lived in “the big house” - turns out they only still had the house because it was protected under law from seizure - dad was in jail for fencing stolen cars, my rent, and the two women who rented the tennis cabana… free and clear to the family.

    you are generalizing from a very small data set and acting like that makes you wiser; it doesn’t.

    Life’s a bitch, and then you die. Your superior data set, you got provenance on that data? You trust it implicitly beyond your personal experiences? That’s a comfortable place to live, until it isn’t. My parents both taught science for 40+ years at various levels. They quit counting the number of times that “facts” they had been taught were overturned by newer, better, more solid findings - after less than 10 years of teaching. That’s the nature of science, and life. Data surrounding public safety officers has been, in my personal life experience, of wildly varying quality but almost always slanted in the direction of improving trust in our sworn officers of the law - improving it beyond what it actually merits.

  • Yep. Thanks.

  • Of course all those things are true, which is why you generally want to live your life in such a way that doesn't get you dragged into court by others, either.

    However - should you ever consider dragging anyone else into court and getting a civil monetary judgement against them, you may also want to consider that an awful lot of the type of people who go around doing things that would make such a judgement relatively easy to obtain, also live their lives in such a way that collecting any actual money from such judgements is exceptionally difficult. Again, making court a waste of time and energy.

    cops seeing a dash cam will make them want to take you to court.

    You're missing a subtlety here... cops don't take you to court, they send you (or your lawyer) to court. Rub a cop wrong and they give you a bogus citation which all they have to do is get a tsk tsk about not showing up to court for, but you either A) pay the citation, or B) pay a lawyer to show up to court to fight the citation for you, or C) spend your time and effort going to court yourself to fight it. Option B being more expensive than option A and option C being most expensive of all if you value your time in the least.

    I really think that’s an incredibly rare cop that feels that way

    Well, I've been around since the 60s, and interacted with a few cops over the years, and most of them have been pretty great people on the whole, the vast majority I'd say, on duty and off. Still, I have interacted with several who did get petty and vindictive and have been tweaked by signs of "anti-cop-paraphernalia" in one's possession, and I suppose when you offset those against all the "good cops" I have interacted with, I get that feeling that "anti-cop-paraphernalia" really does piss them off. All the online videos of cops in the 2000-2020 era trying to beat up people filming them with cell phones doesn't help either.

    I can’t reason you out of a position you didn’t reason yourself into.

    Likewise.