The 4 core part is 30-35% of sd 820 and 20-25% of the rpi 5 equivalent. The 6 core is 40% of sd 820 and 30% of rpi5 in single thread and 70% of sd 820 and 45% or rpi in multi thread.
Oh didn't catch that there was amemory upgrade, that does make it better. The 4 core one should be 25-30% of 2016 flagship phone performance and 12% of rpi 5.
It's not the libre hardware tax that bothers me, it's that there's no smartphone with specs this low released since 2022. What I think about when I hear 'handheld computer' isn't something weaker than a midrange phone from 2016.
With these specs the company needs to explain why they aren't offering more powerful options imo.
It's wild to me that 'enthusiast' devices in 2026 use 4gb of ram and 4xA53 or 6xA55 processors. Meanwhile similarly priced phones have 8gb ram, 2xA78+6xA55 processors, high refresh rate displays and all the other things a phone might have that this doesn't.
I know that most big soc manufacturers don't have open firmwares, but this isn't even using a moderately powerful Rockchip soc.
Such a weird thing that Apple keeps putting cutting edge top end processors in their simplest devices used by non-techy people while tech gadgets like this have old af low end processors
“We are a small company, we have investors, and we have a product,” Stephen Coates, one of Operation Bluebird’s cofounders, told Ars.
A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.
Now imagining how it would be if it was expected, perhaps even mandated that every building have cameras and microphones built into the walls. Grand majority of criminals live in buildings after all
I understand why oss office programs can't display the 'transitional' .docx corretly, but why does it go the other way as well? When I export a 'strict' .docx or an .odf from my viewer why does it still sometimes look wrong when opened in ms office or a different oss office program?
Pretty sure narrow text width has been a thing for ages, even before smartphones. Unless you mean a newer, narrower style I guess. It's easier to read when you can see both ends of a line at the same time so even letters are written on portrait paper.
And I'm not a web developer, but if I had to guess styling a page to limit the text width on a wide screen probably takes more effort, not less.
Not sure if this is ai but it is slop. The title, subtitle, quote and 1st paragraph are pretty much the same and 2rd paragraph is also the same but longer. Who writes like this?
I'm honestly not interested in arguing this further. There's obviously a significant mindset difference between us.
To me answering a different question than what was asked and insisting that it was the question has two explanations: The person genuinely misunderstood the question, or they are intellectually dishonest akin to a politican trying to maintain their image. Both cases lose all their credibility in my eyes, even if I agree with their message. But it seems many people are okay with any manner of speech as long as the message is one they already believe in
I don't think I can change your worldview. Good day
Vs phones from geekbench scores of sd 410 vs sd 820, vs rpi from this page.
Looking at them again it seems the a53 is clocked way below this device in both, my bad.
Here's the correct comparson, vs sd 820 and sd 653.
The 4 core part is 30-35% of sd 820 and 20-25% of the rpi 5 equivalent. The 6 core is 40% of sd 820 and 30% of rpi5 in single thread and 70% of sd 820 and 45% or rpi in multi thread.