Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
17
Comments
387
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • All cutie pies. Even those hiding.

  • InfinCute.

  • I wanted.to say the same but with more expletives.

  • This void hits very close to heart.

  • The writing is very of its time but for all his flaws, Joss Whedon has a knack for funny dialogue. I think the earlier commenter did much better justice to the show than I could though.

  • I know Principal Flutie would have said, 'Kids need understanding. Kids are human beings.' That's the kind of woolly-headed, liberal thinking that leads to being eaten.

    Probably my favourite principal Snyder quote.

  • I gave up on closing the bathroom door, which was fine when only my cat lived there.

    But eventually I got a serious gf and forgot that normal people shut the door while pooping. I can still hear her shriek as she walked by "WE'RE NOT THERE YET!"

  • I understand why you wouldn't want thay cat in the shower but that sounds crazy adorable.

  • Removed

    Lemmy Becoming

    Jump
  • All those voidcats are clearly indicative of all the phobias, duh.

  • Awww, my void adopts that same posture and expression when it's belly rub time.

  • <(and by eventually I mean within these four years)

    Yeah, I think that's pretty nonsensical.

    Were that the case, there's no reason for Smotrich to wait until after the election to announce his actual intentions etc. Nor any reason for them to hold back until now. Your take requires some incredibly coincidental timing that I don't think just happened magically.

    Like, I get your argument I just think it's more than a little silly but to each their own.

    Cheers.

  • I mean, I missed a word but that definitely made it more confusing (even if it was paraphrasing your point.)

    Am I understanding your argument is that:

    You feel Israel will eventually annex the West Bank so it doesn't matter whether Harris or trump won in 2024?

  • In this case the assumption isn’t wrong, because while Harris would likely keep Biden’s policies Trump is going to change a lot of things for the worse, but if you assume that things won’t change under either administration then climate change would be the same under either president.

    This might literally be one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

    "Sure, things will be different but then if you assume things won't change then they're the same."

    I feel dumber for having interacted with you, I'm done.

  • That's an impressively self centered privileged possible view.

    "Sure, a lot of you are going to die but I think it would have happened either way so there's no difference between Harris and trump."

    Especially when you factor in the Left's newfound support for Palestine and that there would presumably be support to push for changing the status quo, this somehow manages to be an even dumber take.

    the only difference between what they’re trying to do and the status quo is what things are names.

    That's just nonsense. One is likely the end of the road for Palestineans in the West Bank, the other at least has chances for an alternative.

    It's as dumb as arguing that climate change would be the same under either President because you don't think things will change.

  • Look, if you understand the simmering West Bank conflict and slow annexation then it's even sillier to try and argue that trump and Harris mean the same thing for Palestinians, which was the entire point of the original comment.

    Under trump, it looks like that project might finally get finished, whereas a Harris Biden administration was at the very least basically keeping the status quo intact.

    Ideally, as tik tok has taught many progressives that Palestine exists and is worthy of care, you could see progressives voting (okay, but a man can dream) in the Democratic 2026 primaries and moving towards a 2 state solution. That is in now way realistic under a trump administration and once the annexation is finished, there isn't a going back.

    but that aside he might’ve felt emboldened to say it out loud,

    Yeah, almost like it was something he wasn't able to say or pursue during a Biden administration. Of course there were plans but being able to act on them required trump to win.

  • Always does not mean "since I started paying attention" but regardless...

    Anyway, you're so close! Let's tey the socratic method, given that the West Bank has been an Israeli target for years, why do you think the violence has been at such a lower level than Gaza since the rapes and murders of Oct 7th?

    And why did that coincidentally change days after the election, with Smoterich now directing "the start of professional work to prepare the necessary infrastructure to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria."

    If you're ruling out Biden etc, was it just a wild miracle of timing?

  • I'm just finishing the Crippled God now! Definitely a difficult series but so infinitely rewarding (and heart breaking.)

  • From the article:

    In the past year, about 4,555 Palestinians have been displaced in the West Bank after Israeli forces demolished their homes.

    Now, I'm no mathematician but surely you understand that's orders of magnitude fewer than have been displaced in Gaza, right? Please?

  • What new settlements happened thete in the last year? You are conflating an increase in tensions and conflict with expansion.