Skip Navigation

Posts
5
Comments
774
Joined
3 yr. ago

All aboard the LainTrain - We all love Lain!

  • Oh yeah, I agree. Though there are some exceptions of specialists who are also great storytellers too and can get you interested in anything, and then there are super generalists who get into rabbit holes and can connect niche concepts across multiple fields in unexpected and cool ways.

  • I did explore some stuff on the Gemini circumlunar ring but it was all just endless hyper-niche microblogs about tech, and not even fun home/side project stuff, but more like some kind of specially configured redis caching solution they implemented at work once, described like something you'd bring up in a job interview. I'm too normal to be any kind of specialist and unfortunately I find specialists to be the most boring people on Earth, they all give me the vibe of the onion anteater guy, so I couldn't get into it.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • 10 seems kinda rad ngl

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I'm curious if anyone ever made a "Super Mercator" projection, something where "ze west" is even more exaggerated and some continents even more disproportionately reduced missing/removed to own the libs. It kinda sounds like something governments would do/people would like nowadays.

  • That's so cool. I love the windows 7 look, really was the true peak of old school desktop OS aesthetics.

    I use the DWMblur on my desktop PC myself alongside aerotweaker, oldnewexplorer and cracked startisback and some winhawk mods to get a decent look while still being usable but on a hack level this is way cooler.

    Lurking the winclassic forums and checking out some new project is a great pass time for when I'm feeling kinda brain-dead.

  • I'm always pro-information availability, so this sucks, I hope the repo was archived and returns and the FOSS paradigm proves resistant to harassment and the repo finds a new home.

    I think the title of this thread is a tad inflammatory though, as for the quality of AI code, I mean, tbqh it's more an issue of maintainers and standards. I've seen plenty of code written by flesh and blood people they themselves couldn't explain either. Like if there was LLM code in the Linux kernel, I'd trust it no less than any other code in the Linux kernel because I trust Linus and others working on it and their eagle eyes and high standards for spotting problems and bugs, having passed the same standard I'd have absolutely zero issues with the code regardless of where it came from.

  • Almost half the average electricity standing charge of approx. £196 per year (or £320 if they also have a gas supply which a lot of people in the country do). Or about 1.5% of yearly rent assuming small 1-bed in low demand area. Or around as much as elderly homeowners (who own the power and decide elections) get for free via the WFP from our taxes.

    I'm sorry, good god our energy is a mess.

  • Yeah, you're right, I'm an it scmuck in cyber now but it doesn't mean I failed at computers, I don't want a more stressful job, I don't want to program for a living, I just enjoy learning computer science.

    As for uni yeah now it's just extra years of high school, up to an MSc is mandatory if you want to succeed, and by succeed I mean have a job, and even then your chances are very slim.

  • Haha, god bless, that's the spirit!

  • I used to love computers... still do, but good god do I hate tech companies and all this shit it's spawned. My last remaining line of defense mentally is that at work we have shifted to a mostly Windows environment, and my interests lie with the Unix side of things.

  • Aye, true that, I don't think I said anything contradictory to what you replied with.

  • Also, FYI, when scientists say "blue light" they don't mean literally the colour blue, they mean short wavelength light typically emitted by LEDs.

    As far as the hue goes, the results in animal testing have been inconsistent, there's a paper from 2022 that says it has no influence, and this one from 2020 that actually found the opposite to be the case https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(19)31368-5

    In my personal experience I do the exact opposite of all conventional advice as admittedly a diagnosed ADHDer.

    I cannot sleep without a good scroll and never have, before phones I had books and before I could read as a child I had music and my mom to read to me.

    As an adult if I keep listening to something or reading something intently while comfy I will eventually and fairly quickly fall asleep.

    I also sleep much better when I sleep immediately after or while scrolling/reading/doing anything than if I try to sleep "normally".

    The number one way for me personally not to fall asleep is to "try" to sleep. Any sort of "ritual" around sleeping or attempt to deprive myself of stimulation and my mind will go pretty crazy with infinite thoughts and infinite random bullshit and I will fling out of bed in an hour full of energy and start projects, after working on something for 10-20 min I'll feel sleepy again and could even fall asleep while doing them easily, much more so than in plain dark.

    It also helps me to not have any sort of ritual and just sleep whenever I feel sleepy if the circumstances allow. I have no idea why or how neurotypicals have sleep schedules and I've given up on understanding it. For me, as long as I get 8 hours or so it doesn't actually matter at all when I get them, i will feel as fresh and awake waking up at 3AM as I would at 10PM or 7AM as long as I get my hours.

    So I pretty much get 8 hours, and sometimes more every day and I feel nice and fresh when I wake up usually with sad exceptions during particularly rough work weeks where I end up staying up way late.

    All's I'm saying is YMMV, I've never had any issues with sleep nor do I feel particularly tired, I don't drink coffee nor alcohol, but if I ever explain this to a doctor they go nuts and assume I have insomnia, they try to offer "treatment" when I literally don't have any problems with this at all.

  • That's so cool! Thanks for sharing it!

  • I remember making fun of VLC users on /a/ and flexing my MPC-HC/MadVR setup that made my laptop fans rev and the screen flash just going fullscreen. That was over a decade ago now. Good times.

  • Because you don't care about making art, so you choose comfort and financial safety.

    Yeah, I choose to eat, so do you, evidently.

    But my choices on how I earn that bread were more limited than yours, again - evidently.

    Beyond that, I choose not to make assumptions about you or your life like you've done with mine.

    Also lol "comfort and financial safety". No. Not for most people in most of this world. It's more like survival vs not survival.

    So how does this have nothing to do with privilege? It literally is what privilege is.

    Telling poors to learn art is like telling someone to bet everything on starting a business. It's a good idea only if you're rich, because if you fail - and to learn you must fail sometimes - you can try again, but the working class doesn't get the luxury of second chances.

    You're talking about outsourcing art, but then complain about who actually make art.

    No, I'm talking about generating art from a prompt, I have no issues with people who make art obviously, as long as they don't have an issue with those who lack the resources to develop the skills and instead use AI to put their ideas into action or polish existing ones.

    If you'd like to change my mind, show me a few professionally successful present-day working class artists.

    This means they:

    1. Make most of their income from their work
    2. Most active period this or past decade and they are no older than 40.
    3. Working class background, so no artists in family at all, no industry connections they didn't make themselves, no nepotism etc.

    Also lol, of course I care about making art, why else would I be even talking about it, much less pointing out that generative AI accidentally or not - corrects a class injustice?

    If I saw no value in making art, why would I ever consider it an injustice that the working class cannot enjoy it?

    I make music in my spare time whenever I can and have for years, and no I don't and would never use any generative AI tools for the music itself, nor do I even sample any other music, and I think I've even improved at it somewhat despite a lack of basically any education on the subject matter beyond a few guides and YouTube videos on music theory here and there. It's a highly rewarding hobby.

    Realistically though, that 'whenever' is simply not enough time to create anything professional and polished enough for me to sell and for it to appeal to anyone besides myself and whatever loved one is unfortunate enough to be subjected to it.

  • Do you have another retort besides "lol"? Spending the amount of time required to produce professional art when an income isn't directly guaranteed is a risk most of us can't take, FYI.

    You still can't make

    Yeah and why would I need to?

    If I don't enjoy that particular process nearly enough to learn how to make it good, and I wanted it to be good and I was feeling creative and had an idea for it, I could just get it made for me, free of charge, free of corpo influence or any strings attached. It's a sweet deal.

  • or since there are FOSS AI models that are free as in free beer it allows everyone to access the benefits of the privileged - i.e. those who can specialized in fields like arts that aren't conducive to making enough money out of the gate to survive as a working class person

  • Thank you! And yeah you said it well.

    I might check it out at some point, but I'm not really into mythology tbh, I think the only thing remotely close to that that I've ever consumed is some of the videos from Overly Sarcastic Productions on YT.

    I also wonder where (if anywhere) they teach classical greek myths at school. The literature classes we had in high school - other than Shakespeare - mostly focused on modern period literature from the 19th century onwards (with the most recent book probably being To Kill A Mockingbird ofc and the earliest Silas Marner)

    I guess that's kinda like what's particularly astounding to me about the downvotes. This is not even a matter of privilege and resources, it's simply a matter of: Why would you expect anyone to go out of their way to look up fairly obscure greek myths, unless they were specifically into fairly obscure greek myths? And I already think considering I actively engage with content about mythology even rarely as it may be I imagine most people know much less.

    Heck I had the lucky opportunity for the joy of explaining The Illiad and The Odyssey to my girlfriend recently, who had literally no clue what those even were or that they existed.

    Right now I'm really into space stuff. It's extremely unlikely that if I asked any random person, including myself from like slightly over a week ago, what ORB RATE and INRTL positions on the FDAI switch on Panel 13 do in the Apollo CSM, that they would know what the heck I'm talking about. So I would never make that assumption. It's just kinda baffling to do so.

    We cannot hate on people for not knowing what is unreasonable for anyone but an enthusiast to know. That in itself is refusing to think properly, it is anti-intellectualism, plain and simple. "Ooga Grog no know thing, means Grog bad!" is an insane way to operate, it's reeks of a regressive and unsystemic view of the world.