Anyone else think its wild that they are phrasing it like a "huge loss" when its just another candidate in the same party and just more popular with voters within the party?
- Posts
- 25
- Comments
- 1141
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 25
- Comments
- 1141
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
Also just one of my favorite bits of the article:
Oh no! What a loss to lose the should be retiree