Skip Navigation

Posts
5
Comments
131
Joined
5 mo. ago

[ Cisheterosexual | Cisgender | He/Him | 24 yo | ES/EN | Venezuelan | ADHD, autism and bipolar disorder | agnostic atheist ]


I'm just a random weeb. I love anime, dubstep, science, philosophy, logic and tech all along.

PS: English isn't my native language, so sorry if I mispell some things, please kindly point it to me.

  • I'm fan of dubstep so I relate to you

  • That's the worst part!

  • It is a shitshow. I mean, what the fuck with the totally inconsistent, incoherent and incongruent phonetics (and grammar, and syntax, and spelling...)? That meme ("it's spelled 'Liverpool', it's pronounced 'Manchester'") is more of an anecdote than a joke.

  • It's not like what he said isn't true or actually correct. That's actually comprehending how languages work.

  • But if you do UBI + NIT it would theoretically be sufficient... Although I still think that a strong price regulation and anti-monopoly/anti-oligopoly law should be done for it to work. So yeah, we're cooked.

  • It should be. Also the NIT (Negative Income Tax) so the taxing scheme becomes progressive, rather than regressive. Though I know I'm asking too much because capitalism...

  • Love

  • curl -fsSl keep.yourself.safe

  • $230 > $80B ahhh maths

  • Khosla was stupid though, he should've just use Linux plus COLLABORA Office and/or LibreOffice.

  • You forgot that and .

  • I, as a kid, once said in a cinema "woah, that's a huge TV".

    My parents and uncles wanted to go underground lmao.

  • Giant hug bro! He was sure the best 🥺

  • You can omit the paywall using a web archive like Archive.is or Wayback Machine. Or using uBlock Origin. Or using Unpaywall.

  • I'm just doing this by going to ARRR my music and install Smolsonic.

  • I recommed you reading this

    It summarizes really good not only the moral, but also the legal problems of AI, vibecoding and "AI-assisted/AI-boosted" programming/engineering/development.

  • Yes, I totally understand the logic. It's just a transitivity problem, and can be modeled using a cost-benefit analysis:

    1. A hidden camera is more dangerous for the victim because it is less risky for the creep/abuser.
    2. You will not reasonably believe that a doctor will have a hidden camera inside his office.
    3. A camera exposed to the naked eye is less dangerous for the victim because it is more risky for the creep/abuser.
      • The abuser is unlikely to take that risk because he could lose too much, much more than he would gain.
    4. So it is reasonable not to believe that your doctor will record or photograph you with a camera exposed to the naked eye since it is inherently riskier for the creep, and it is not reasonable to believe otherwise.

    Although, the problem here then shifts to the hardware itself. Like, since these lenses were probably closed source and proprietary hardware, and their software as well, then you don't have a way to prove that if you turn off the camera on said lens (either via the software kill-switch or via the hardware kill-switch) it is actually turning off, or just appears to turn off when it is actually still on but disguised as being turned off. And taking into account that there are precedents of devices doing this (a particularly famous case was that of a smart TV that even when you turned it off, it was not really off, but in a false shutdown, a very low power state where the screen was off, but the core and some telemetry processes, and the microphone, were still running and, thus, recording and sending everything that was recorded to their servers). So the only rational position, at least from a Game Theory point of view, is to assume that every device that is both closed source and closed hardware, that is not Free, Libre and Open Source Software, and Libre and Open Source and Schematics Hardware (yeah, even releasing their schematics), does the same thing.

  • Removed

    Spider hole 2.0

    Jump
  • Also, he should be orange, not red lmao

  • I'm not sure why, maybe is because I live perpetually overstressed and I'm dyscalculic, but I can't just understand anything about the part of actually writing code. Like, I can conceptually and theoretically know really much about programming, programming languages and how they work (and how they would work better), but when it comes to start learning the syntax and what every symbol, word and all that means and how do they combine... Oopsie.

    In few words, I do understand the theory, all the concepts and the programming semantics, but the code grammar is hard for me, and the syntax is nearly impossible as it involves too much maths.

    As architecture and design are more about natural language and logical reasoning, and I'm actually good in those two things (I have hyperlogia [if "hypercalculia" is the polar opposite of dyscalculia, then this is the same for dyslogia]), or at least can be totally done without any maths and totally with only these two things (because yeah, symbolic logic is also hard for me), I can do these things to a pretty good extent.

    Hope this allows you to better undertand. 😄