Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
1052
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Eeeeh I have mixed feelings. I was the parent that had the ability to tack and log my kids, because I was/am heavily into tech. But the only time it was ever really used was “where the hell is [child] he never came home from school” or “what time did I leave [place]?” Or similar.

  • no notes.

    Wait…

  • Oh to be clear I was saying if it was legitimately an age reversing elixir I’d take a stab in the eye.

    Though honestly I’d still take it to cure glaucoma, that shits scary.

  • They darkest time so far.

  • Honestly? If it legitimately did de-age people I doubt this would be that big a sticking point.

  • It really comes down to what the product is intended for. If these were only something that could be used for creating a product to sell, I would agree with you. But in this case it is easily something someone could want for personal use.

  • Not to be rude, but they gave you barebones experience then lied about your experience.

    A senior dev isn’t something you can crash course in even a year, it’s multiple years of experience layered in top of each other.

    A crash course is essentially just a junior dev. Your company just wanted to charge more for your hours.

  • You can walk down to a local Walmart and slap a $20 on the counter, walking away with funds even if you have no car and no credit card.

    Hard for a teenager to get steam games without this.

  • It gets compact, for easier travel.

  • You’d be surprised how many use general delivery, a shelter, or soup kitchen they frequent.

  • You’re not going to convince me that killing people for existing is the answer.

    I’ve already said violence can be the answer depending on the situation, but a blanket “it’s fine to kill them in every situation” is way too far.

  • I’m not saying tolerate them

    It’s right there dude.

  • It is imperative that the cylinder and the larger object remain unharmed.

  • lol

  • I’m actually kinda sad a counter counter group didn’t show up and send some to the hospital. And I suppose I did get a little too into arguing about this, as to your point it’s just a bunch of anonymous people saying things they likely wouldn’t do.

    I was just so taken aback that “hey maybe we shouldn’t take away peoples humanity” was something that the majority took issue with.

  • Look, I’m not going to sit here and list off everything I think is acceptable. The only thing I said we shouldn’t be doing is dehumanizing by killing them for existing. Literally all of the replies stemming from that was because people took issue with that stance.

    You yourself took that to mean I was defending them. Others took it to mean I was simping. Others took it to mean we should be tolerant of them (despite literally saying the opposite >.>)

    Admittedly, some legitimately take issue with the idea that Nazis are humans. But at least those people are actually taking issue with a point I was making.

  • Kick their ass dude, punch them square in the face I don’t give a fuck.

    I never said violence wasn’t an acceptable answer to their actions.

    I said killing them for existing is a problem.

  • I feel the same way about this as I feel for the death penalty.

    The number of people who look back at their life and seriously despise the person they used to be isn’t anywhere close to zero. Hell, look at the work of people like Daryl Davis if you need some actual proof that Nazis and white supremacists can be “brought back” from their extreme beliefs.

    Knowing that some of these people can be shown the error of their ways, how is killing them the answer? Because it really just feels like the “easy and loud” solution that just begets more problems.

  • Hey man, I also don’t agree with the death penalty, so you might wanna revise that tag to include murderes, rapists, and anything else you can think of.