Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
1
Comments
408
Joined
7 mo. ago

  • I've started several attempts to migrate to it, and they've all failed. The workflow just doesn't work for me. It's extremely click-heavy and (subjectively) unintuitive. (I want to delete a file. Why TF can't I just use Del to do that?)

    Lightroom is the single Windows application that I still haven't successfully replaced with a FOSS alternative. It's confined to a Windows VM with no internet access. That's fine for now.

  • "Had its backdoor opened" rather. It's the Epstein class we're dealing with here.

  • "Corruption" is the word you were looking for.

  • Ties to Maxwell, confirmed on Epstein's plane twice... Torture shed it is.

  • This does, however, mean, you're running all of your emails through an oligarch-owned company and is hardly "self-hosted", right?

  • To be fair, I don't trust European companies with it either. As the saying goes: "Where there's a trough, there will be pigs." Want to keep your data safe? Keep it.

  • My feelings exactly. This was not politics leveraged to advance science. This was science abused to advance politics.

  • Karen, that you?

  • DEUS VULT!

  • I am too - every single day. If I didn't know better, I'd think I'm stupid.

  • This, but with DAVx⁵ as a CardDAV client app on Android.

  • Personally, I don't.

    But not everyone is able to (for lack of awareness to alternatives, technical skills, software constraints, work requirements, vendor lock-in, ...). Are those people unworthy of being protected from an evil company's wrongdoing just because they're using the "wrong" OS?

    You're basically arguing that corporations can do whatever they please "on their own turf". That's not true as far as user rights, consumer protection and anti-trust laws are concerned. And it shouldn't be.

  • "You're on my property, I'm allowed to shoot you here."

    While these "ethics" do exist, they're extremely niche. So don't pretend yours aren't.

  • I doubt he will. If you wandered that deep into crazyland, chances are you belong there. I suspect he still wants crazyland - just a different brand from what the clown-in-chief is creating. That's fine by me if it creates a civil war among the crazies.

  • If by "people sorting" you mean "facial recognition" - well, it should "just work". You may, in the admin backend, go to the jobs section and manually force it to start another scan for missing faces.

    That said, it will currently only do facial recognition on the faces in the photos your account owns. If you're using partner sharing (e.g. with your spouse), then you will have separate facial recognition data (only done on your photos) and your spouse will have their own facial recognition data (done on the photos owned by them). Bottom line: facial recognition data is not "shared". If your spouse "owns" all the family photos in your immich, this is why you only see the coworker meme faces and not your family.

    The same is true for memories.

    The situation is unsatisfactory at the moment, but I've talked to the devs and it's on their roadmap, so this will be addressed in an upcoming release.

  • Music isn't expensive to self-host; 1 min of music cost you roughly 1MB of space, which means your playlist of 7k tracks (assumed average length: 5 mins) clocks in at around 35 GB of storage space. So just start collecting.

    As for your other request. I'm not too familiar with Spotify, but a net search yielded this. I cannot speak to the legality if any of the solutions recommended there, and if they still work (the thread is 2 years old).

  • @Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works was faster than me (thanks!). Yes, as of now, firmware updates for existing models are only allowed for yet another year and must be discontinued after. As always in this administration, the reasons given for these measures (Chinese attacks on US infrastructure) are built on lies and misinformation (none of the attacks targeted consumer routers). Hence, this is likely just another shakedown: "pay us a bribe or we'll damage your opportunities to do business in the US." Depending on whether foreign router vendors opt to go this route and give in to the orange grifter's demands, things may be different in a years' time.

    Could you in theory demand a refund from the government if you were willing to switch to their backdoor US hardware now?

    From a government of the Epstein class, by the Epstein class, for the Epstein class? No. You most certainly cannot.

  • Old or new, doesn't matter. They stopped allowing you to download books licensed ("sold") through the kindle shop in order to prevent you from putting them onto your device via cable.

    ...which makes "cunt behaviour" even more accurate. ;)

  • No misunderstanding, that's precisely what I meant and linked to.