Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
0
Comments
354
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • Oh I definitely voted for him to be next but we're probably talking about different things

  • It's almost as if institutional independence and public trust was important or something.... Oh well. Probably best to burn it down and start from scratch anyways.

  • Wild. What about all the other crimes?

  • Just another reason to use the word liberal as a slur

  • Weird how that keeps happening, huh

  • Yeah, for individuals it works best if you host your own locally or use a cloud as you said, then use push mirroring to backup to github or one of the other big forges. Gets you 98% of the utility with minimal cost.

  • Self hosted forgejo on-prem HA with cloud mirroring, backups, and failover

    Codeberg itself is fine for hobby-grade tho; enterprise needs to start taking ownership of their own shit. Deploying local CI is a buy-once-cry-one pitch and gives you better performance anyways.

    Or, use git decentralized; how it was built to be used.

  • 9.99% is still three nines so

  • I output more personalized smut mods than anyone ever thought possible

  • Tools are just tools; there are good ways and bad ways to use them. "Grok, go find bugs in the Linux kernel" isn't a good one. This isn't hard to understand...

    There were many, partially well-intentioned, mostly fame-seeking, one-off 'projects' 'scanning' public repos and flooding them with low-quality low-effort PRs and issues; things that no human ever read until the a maintainer did.

    "They made a poison and sold us a cure" is absolutely a valid criticism; that's two sides of the same coin. But pretending that he's being hypocritical or that LLMs aren't useful is just being wrong for the sake of hating AI

  • (which I'm not)

    "My 'I'm not Dr. Fauci' T-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my shirt"

  • This will only catch (literally) zero effort abuse.

  • You're making the bold assumption that the law works, which is a pillar that isn't as reliable as it used to be. You're likely right, but I don't think that's an immediate foregone conclusion

  • The fucktard who made the Oculus Rift likes to use my preferred operating system to kill people. Tech is a wild world.

    Edit: actually not just tech. Capitalism is just evil in general and polutes everything both literally and metaphorically

    We live in a world where it's sorta just widely understood that the bottled-water chocolate-bar company murders people for profit on the regular

    It's all fucked at every level

  • Surely by removing caps and taxing billionaires yes?

  • I see you have chosen Diarrhea Forever

    An odd choice, but okay

    Enjoy your corpo-owned dems Wisconsin

    Surely this time things will be different

  • Primarily available to the extremely privileged

    My local LLM narrowly fetching and caching a page or two isn't what's been hitting infra across the global and making indie sites blow up or die out. Doesn't matter if the small players can't buy the same access as the big players; they don't need it and it's not really for them.

    (liability to asset) For whom?

    The balance sheet. I didn't mean it in the abstract.

  • Surprised this hasn't been cross-posted to the fuckcars subs yet

  • Its all public anyways. Its more like they sold infrastructure access afaik. Which is a smart move. Money aside, unauthorized scraping is a much bigger PITA and can drain resources quickly, including financial resources. Selling access means you can regulate it and also make it go thru appropriate infra; plus it becomes an asset rather than a liability. Not a fan of the wikimedia org lately, but I don't fault them for that one.