Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
7
Comments
392
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • And even then the European countries that feel they're ahead of the rest tackling racism it's usually only the urban university educated talking with their fingers in their ears ignoring the majority of the rest of their country.

  • I feel slightly less dirty afterwards than at McDonald's...

  • Your project sounds interesting and quite niche. Although it's presented well it's not something I'd immediately be inspired to contribute to, but there's nothing wrong with the project itself. What problem is it solving? Who's going to save time using it? Perhaps include a scenario so that people who aren't immediately familiar 'get' what it is you're achieving?

  • Can we not

  • I don't think it's a good thing! It just seems to be inevitable..

  • Well let's find out..

  • Same here, though has to be slightly chilled for me. Slightly warm chocolate orange is all wrong.

  • autism_IT_superpower_trope.jpg

    Joking aside. I struggle in everyday conversation or in most job settings because the small inconsistencies and inaccuracies that are a normal part of everyday speech accrue in my head without any discharge in a painful way and I either detach to cope (and look like I don't give a shit) or have to splurge back at someone all the minor nonsense logical inconsistencies they've been using over the last few minutes. Or people rely so much on you being in the same mental world as they are that I genuinely don't understand what they mean and come across like a pedantic asshole. From experience this is deeply unwelcome. I would not last long anywhere where normal conversation and ways of thinking is not the thing under the microscope.

    In software development, I can take architects, senior devs, department heads, c-level execs.. whoever.. streaming technical info, regulatory requirements, business processes at me seemingly for any length of time because I can ask anything I want and at the end of it they'll ask me what's wrong with it and I can give them a list and how to fix it. I'm also completely immune to telling senior-whomever that they are wrong, because when I tell them, it's because they are and I can show them why.

    For this I am paid $$$. Anywhere else I would be fired.

    (Also, watch The Accountant, it's great)

  • Probably running something like yt-dlp

  • Many heretical texts were not preserved though it's more likely they were simply copied less due to being less popular. What's known of them is preserved in the church fathers discussing them and arguing against them. But aside from the fact there's no positive evidence that heretical texts were deliberately destroyed, the fact that the church fathers quote them and make arguments against them in surviving documents shows there's was no campaign to eradicate discussion of them nor hide the fact that they ever existed.

    Which is what makes it even less likely that there was some great debate over what the text of, say, Matthews gospel was that was then settled and somehow covered up. There's no evidence that this took place at all.

    The original author of (for example) Mathew was not the apostle Matthew, it was written somewhere around 80-100. But the fact that a single version was widespread in the second century and even churches far apart are quoting the same version and evidence for any debate of its content is lacking that shows the text is most likely stable from very shortly after it was written. The same goes for the other gospels, Paul's undisputed letters and most other NT texts.

    "Heresies" were entire other books, not different versions of the canonical texts. There were examples of short forms of gospels being used (Marcion's Luke) but not entire alternate versions.

    The simplest explanation for this is that gospels were produced by a sponsoring church (in Matthews case, Antioch) and then accepted by other churches and rapidly copied widely. There is no evidence later churches substantially rewrote it and some sort of battle ensued.

    We know from how church fathers talked about other disagreements that there would have been no issue preserving such a dispute had it happened.

  • Kindly refrain from posting utter shite in the technology community

  • SELL 200 APRIL AT ONE FORTY TWO!

  • There are over 600 lines of test code for every line of code in SQLite

    Holy mother of god

  • The OT for sure. The NT is different, there's decent evidence the NT was substantially completed in the first century with minor edits in the second. (Wholesale rewrites in the first century totally on the table, though unlikely)

    As a secular scholar I'd point to the lack of substantive differences between the versions used by the widely dispersed church fathers in the early second century, their preoccupation with pointing out error, and their lack of having to tackle massive differences in the text when they tackled lots of other problems and heresies

  • Evo moment 37

  • Are you talking about an asymptote? Things "in the limit" is maths voodoo whenever infinity is involved

  • Owen noted that while AI characters could be a “creative new entertainment format”, there was a risk that they might flood platforms with low-quality material that undermines creators’ craft as well as erode confidence among users.

    "Hey, humanity, how's it going?"

    "The world's most technical minds have found a way to make social media worse just to squeeze out just a little more profit"

    "Jesus Christ"

  • That's totally true, but people just seem to do it less on the whole

  • ew..