Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
7
Comments
392
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Yes! Exactly this thank you

    For example, one group of gates has no logical connection to the rest of the circuit, yet is crucial to its function

    (I should have gone with my gut, I knew it was ages ago. 30ish years by the sound of it!)

  • Maybe, but remember generative AI isn't any kind of deductive or methodical reasoning. It's literally "mash up the publicly available info and give a crowd sourced version of what to add next". This works for art because this kind of random harmony appeals to us asthetically and art is an area where people seek fewer constraints. But when you're engineering it's the opposite. Maybe it's useful to get engineers out of a rut and imagine new possibilities. But that's it. Generative AI has no idea if what's it's smushed together is garbage or randomly insightful.

  • It makes a break from the AI slop usually dished up but yes I agree with you

  • I remember this too, it was years and years ago (I almost want to say 2010-2015). Can't find anything searching for it

  • Read the article, it's still 'dreaming' and spewing garbage, it's just that in some iterations it's gotten lucky. "Human oversight needed" they say. The AI has no idea what it's doing.

  • bruh..

  • I'm going to need class 101 on 411 as I've no idea what it is

  • For your info, this is known as 'hand waving'

  • It's not a very useful currency if deflation is making people hoard it..

  • I tend to enjoy being devil's advocate on controversial subjects so I'd score a 9/10 fucked through sheer misinterpretation

  • ♬ One of these things is not like the others.. ♬

  • Ok, that's great. I get what you're trying to do now.

    I think in terms of getting input I can only suggest that deliberately invoking Cunningham's law is probably going to get you more responses that anything else. You are honest and upfront about the code being unstable but this is unlikely to motivate someone to audit it for you. Simply stating it's the most secure web chat available for x reasons is more likely to motivate someone to prove you wrong. Even if their motivations are negative you might still find the insight valuable..

  • I suspect such a model would have to be far more attuned to its data being smaller but trustworthy. Something like chatGPT for example requires a huge volume because it's weakly affected by any particular datum going in. It's designed to adapt to general conversation norms, rather than specific facts. If you could take a generalist like chatGPT and combine it with an expert model that's been told everything it's told has a huge weighting then that would probably be a big step forward.

  • It can survive well where there's editorial control. I'd talk to an AI if it had only read encyclopedias for example..

  • Search is eventually going to be so enshitified that the way to actually find out things is going to fall back on "ask someone you trust who knows things you don't". At least by that point those trustworthy people should be better informed than in the past..

  • This is beautiful. If only all tutorials were actually written well.

  • Impressive! I assume this must be the part ii of each day?

    Meanwhile I spent a lot of time pulling my hair out on day 2 part ii because I read the question wrong..

  • Depends how you learn. Being mindful of what your goal is helps. C# can be used for console apps, it can also be used to make ASP.Net websites, further afield you can program the Unity games engine with C#. Each of these will have "absolute beginner most basic first steps" type tutorials out there. They'll all have some similarity as you'll need to just learn the C# syntax one way out another, but it miles easier doing this if you're vaguely interested in the types of apps you're heading towards.

    If all else fails, message me, I was there once, about 20 years ago..