Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E

Even_Adder

@ Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts
7
Comments
48
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • The fair use doctrine allows you to do just that. The alternative would be someone being able to publish a book and then shutting anyone else out of publishing, discussing, or building on their ideas without them getting a kick-back.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • The funny part is most of the headlines want you to believe that using things without permission is somehow against copyright. When in reality, fair use is a part of copyright law, and the reason our discourse isn't wholly controlled by mega-corporations and the rich. It's sad watching people desperately trying to become the kind of system they're against.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I recommend reading this article by Cory Doctorow, and this one by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries.

  • Perplexity open sources R1 1776, a version of the DeepSeek R1 model that CEO Aravind Srinivas says has been “post-trained to remove the China censorship”.

    Jump

  • I just want to mess with this one too. I had a hard time finding an abliterated one before that didn't fail the Tiananmen Square question regularly.

  • Perplexity open sources R1 1776, a version of the DeepSeek R1 model that CEO Aravind Srinivas says has been “post-trained to remove the China censorship”.

    Jump

  • Can't wait to try a distillation. The full model is huge.

  • Removed

    deepseek's model claims to be chatgpt during conversation. what does this mean?

    Jump

  • I've heard of this happening when you generate datasets with ChatGPT to help train your model. OpenAI doesn't want you doing this, making it against their terms of use, but there's nothing they can do to stop people. You can generate some really good synthetic datasets from ChatGPT, and it's perfectly legal to do.

    Were you running it locally?

  • I agree

    Jump

  • Matt wasn't that good at tennis.

  • Corner void

    Jump

  • Glorious.

  • Nice little nap

    Jump

  • Chiaroscuro Scooter.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Here's a video explaining how diffusion models work, and this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Your comment made my day. Thanks.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Anyone spreading this misinformation and trying gatekeep being an artist after the avant-garde movement doesn't have an ounce of education in art history. Generative art, warts and all, is a vital new form of art that's shaking things up, challenging preconceptions, and getting people angry - just like art should.

  • Different perspectives on dogs

    Jump

  • I still only see half a dog.

  • Different perspectives on dogs

    Jump

  • What dogs? There isn't a single complete dog on here.

  • What are your AI use cases?

    Jump

  • Entertainment.

  • When RTX 5090 is realesed...

    Jump

  • If you want to run local AI stuff, the more VRAM and muscle you've got, the better.

  • X updates its privacy policy to allow third parties to train AI models with its data

    Jump

  • Their policy could never stop anyone in the first place.

  • Deleted

    Chat GPT will openly admits it uses copyrighted works without permission

    Jump

  • Using copyrighted works without permission isn't illegal and shouldn't be. You should check out this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF, and this open letter by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries.

  • Peanut and Franky sharing a chair

    Jump