Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E

Even_Adder

@ Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts
7
Comments
48
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Firefox's beta feature "Smart Window" shared browsing and search history to AI models without prompting

    Jump

  • It would be really cool if they didn't do that this time.

  • Firefox's beta feature "Smart Window" shared browsing and search history to AI models without prompting

    Jump

  • There’s also an option to bring your own LLM, with fields for model name, endpoint, and API token available for entry when the manual option is enabled. However, the page itself warns local models may not work correctly.

    It looks like there's an option for people to self-host too. You won't have to send your history to someone else's computer.

  • Anyone interested in AI radio?

    Jump

  • Don't mind the downvotes, they're from people who don't even use this community.

  • LocalLLaMA @sh.itjust.works
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Hermes 4 - Nous Research

    hermes4.nousresearch.com
  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    JELSTUDIO/JEL_LLMradiotheater_Ollama: Two LLMs have a conversation using Ollama

    github.com /JELSTUDIO/JEL_LLMradiotheater_Ollama

  • FuckLAPD Let You Use Facial Recognition to Identify Cops.

    Jump

  • Record them anyway. There'll be more ways to de-anonymize them in the future.

  • Is Google about to destroy the web?

    Jump

  • But the people making money off of all of that are mad now, hence this article.

  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    resemble-ai/chatterbox: SoTA open-source TTS

    github.com /resemble-ai/chatterbox

  • Why so much hate toward AI?

    Jump

  • OpenAI's Sora is now available for Free to all users through Bing Video Creator

    Jump

  • Microsoft is wasting their money on this.

  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    PlayDiffusion - Advanced AI Voice Inpainting Model

    playdiffusion.com

  • Former Meta exec (Nick Clegg) says asking for artist permission will kill AI industry

    Jump

  • So you don't interact with AI stuff outside of that? Have you seen any cool research papers or messed with any local models recently? Getting a bit of experience with the stuff can help you better inform people and see through the more bogus headlines.

  • Former Meta exec (Nick Clegg) says asking for artist permission will kill AI industry

    Jump

  • It definitely seems that way depending on what media you choose to consume. You should try to balance the doomer scroll with actual research and open source news.

  • Former Meta exec (Nick Clegg) says asking for artist permission will kill AI industry

    Jump

  • Ok, but is training an AI so it can plagiarize, often verbatim or with extreme visual accuracy, fair use? I see the 2 first articles argue that it is, but they don’t mention the many cases where the crawlers and scrappers ignored rules set up to tell them to piss off. That would certainly invalidate several cases of fair use

    You can plagiarize with a computer with copy & paste too. That doesn't change the fact that computers have legitimate non-infringing use cases.

    Instead of charging for everything they scrap, law should force them to release all their data and training sets for free.

    I agree

    I’d wager 99.9% of the art and content created by AI could go straight to the trashcan and nobody would miss it. Comparing AI to the internet is like comparing writing to doing drugs.

    But 99.9% of the internet is stuff that no one would miss. Things don't have to have value to you to be worth having around. That trash could serve as inspiration for your 0.1% of people or garner feedback for people to improve.

  • Former Meta exec (Nick Clegg) says asking for artist permission will kill AI industry

    Jump

  • But the law is largely the reverse. It only denies use of copyright works in certain ways. Using things "without permission" forms the bedrock on which artistic expression and free speech are built upon.

    AI training isn’t only for mega-corporations. Setting up barriers like these only benefit the ultra-wealthy and will end with corporations gaining a monopoly of a public technology by making it prohibitively expensive and cumbersome for regular folks. What the people writing this article want would mean the end of open access to competitive, corporate-independent tools and would jeopardize research, reviews, reverse engineering, and even indexing information. They want you to believe that analyzing things without permission somehow goes against copyright, when in reality, fair use is a part of copyright law, and the reason our discourse isn’t wholly controlled by mega-corporations and the rich.

    I recommend reading this article by Kit Walsh, and this one by Tory Noble staff attorneys at the EFF, this one by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries, and these two by Cory Doctorow.

  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    fpgaminer/joycaption: JoyCaption Beta One Release - An image captioning Visual Language Model

  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Ace-Step Audio Model Native Support in ComfyUI!

    blog.comfy.org /p/stable-diffusion-moment-of-audio
  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    ACE-Step: A Step Towards Music Generation Foundation Model

    ace-step.github.io

  • Which year: guess which year each photo was taken

    Jump

  • https://whichyr.com/

    WhichYear 4/22/25 4944 pts (top 1%) 1️⃣ avg. years off

    🎯 1️⃣ 1️⃣ 1️⃣ 3️⃣

  • Why training AI can't be IP theft

    Jump

  • An alluring oversimplification, but your cynical framework can't account for the communities of people who put in time and effort into FOSS projects. The quality and popularity of open source alternatives has eroded the moats of proprietary services, making it impossible for them to monopolize and profit from this public technology. So if it happened the way it did, it wasn't for the reasons stated.

  • Why training AI can't be IP theft

    Jump

  • I don't think there is one single purpose. That's a hard question to answer.

  • Why training AI can't be IP theft

    Jump

  • AI training isn’t only for mega-corporations. Setting up barriers that only benefit the ultra-wealthy will only end with corporations gaining a monopoly of a public technology by making it prohibitively expensive for regular folks. And that's before they bind users to predatory ToS, allowing them exclusive access to user data and effectively selling our own data back to us. What some people want would mean the end of open access to competitive, corporate-independent tools and would imperil research, reviews, reverse engineering, and even indexing information.

    They want you to believe that analyzing things without permission somehow goes against copyright, when in reality, fair use is a part of copyright law, and the reason our discourse isn’t wholly controlled by mega-corporations and the rich. The same people who abuse DMCA takedown requests for their chilling effects on fair use content now need your help to do the same thing to open source AI. Their next greatest foe after libraries, students, researchers, and the public domain. Don't help them do it.

    I recommend reading this article by Cory Doctorow, and this open letter by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries.

  • “It Wouldn’t Be Surprising If, in Two Years’ Time, There Was a Film Made Completely Through AI”: Says Hayao Miyazaki’s Own Son

    Jump

  • Is Miyazaki going to go in on his son again?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Fuck 'em. I don't care. I hope no one uses them.

  • US appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creator

    Jump

  • He's not trying to get copyright for something he generated, he's trying to have the court award copyright to his AI system "DABUS", but copyright is for humans. Humans using Gen AI are eligible for copyright according to the latest guidance by the United States Copyright Office.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • One of the provisions of fair use is the effects on the market. If your spambot is really shitting up the place, you may very well run afoul of the doctrine.