I worry about that hitting the small sellers on there sometimes, like I ordered something through Amazon recently that very clearly came from a 3rd party small business and it's a quality product. It got mixed up when I returned something else, and they were like "just keep the refund for both" :/ but I'm worried the 3rd party won't get paid for it now
Now that's interesting, last I heard he still had, like, groupies following him around the country (as he continues to campaign despite being the sitting president)
I definitely didn't mean that I wish there was just one individual person who swore off AI haha I'm definitely aware that is a thing, but I'm glad to hear it anyway
Right, so they can say "over 7,000 child abuse images of her were created, allegedly by her step father" but they don't. They make it sound like her entire claim is in doubt.
Two things, 1. I'm a little confused by all the "she claims" and "alleged" language. I think it would be easy to verify the images exist, in which case the only claims up in the air is who actually created the images, and 2. I feel like if we lived in a healthy society, people would say "wow that's what these tools are being used for? Then I swear off of them until they can be made safe at a minimum." The degree to which people just dgaf will never not be shocking to me, but they especially dgaf what happens to women and children
Less than 3 in 10 respondents approved of the president’s handling of the job market and the economy, with half of his 2024 supporters sharing their approval, according to the poll.
What I want to know is how many of those people that disapprove of his handling of jobs and the economy still approve of him overall lol.
Lol I did not understand your post the first time I read it, I think that might be the reason for downvotes.
I don't think anyone I follow has ever been on his show! I will say that I was once a UFC fan and just about every person associated with it has become so repugnant (or I just noticed they are) that I had to walk away.
Yeah, it can be both, like, if you want to argue that in our current capitalist society people need to be compensated fairly for their work, I'll hear that argument, but I don't think it's the best or most accurate framing. I think it's just as obnoxious reddit made a deal with google to train on my (and everyone else's) comments throughout the website as I do the possibility it was trained on my artwork, and I'm not alone in that.
His other comment applies just as easily to to stolen medical images, like this woman's , as it does more creative works. It feels violating either way. Virtually no one is worried about Mickey Mouse appearing in data sets, but lots of people do feel wronged when their emails are trained on without permission or compensation, even though they're not really IPs.
I want to follow this!