Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
7
Comments
639
Joined
2 yr. ago

Refugee from another, less-friendly instance. Please forgive the youth of my account— I’ve actually been around here for a while. Still, glad to be here!

  • Which was flawed logic and not based on facts.

    Why would you do that?

  • Argument as populum— being popular does not make you correct. Neither does your refusal to accept reality.

    Again, what led you to the conclusion you made? The facts don’t support it.

  • So? That certainly doesn’t explain your nonsense logic.

  • she has given strong lip service to women's rights, but the Democrats have always done that with everything

    And the dems have a great track record supporting and expanding Women’s rights. It was the GOP and their judges who overturned Roe while restricting women’s rights in every state they can.

    lip service with no plans or intent

    Only of you get your news straight from Trump. Here, in reality, that’s obviously not true

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/29/kamala-harris-abortion-restoring-roe-00171657

  • I, too, would love to watch Harris curbstomp Trump again

  • At least then, the rest of us would be safe

  • Like everything you’ve ever said here, that makes no sense.

    Dems are concerned she’ll be a spoiler candidate whose votes will help Trump win (and they’re right about that), not that Stein would be a viable candidate— this has been explained to you. You’re conflating the two.

    And, more faulty logic:

    If there weren't lots of people disagreeing with you and voting third party, then you'd have nothing to worry about

    Once again, Dems aren’t worried she would win or that she’s popular (as neither are true). And it doesn’t take “lots” to spoil the election, just “enough”.

    Single-digit percentages - a tiny fraction - does not constitute “a lot” nor “popular”.

    Again, your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. It doesn’t even make you popular.

  • How did you arrive at that conclusion? The facts don’t support it. Democrats were ever worried that Stein would be elected.

  • Argumentum ad populum logical fallacy: being popular doesn’t make you correct. And obviously not many really think that, or Stein would actually be a viable candidate.

    Once again, Your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. And, by the numbers, it doesn’t make you popular either.

  • Pop tarts

  • Yeah, for Trump. Because that’s what a vote for Jill Stein is.

    Your refusal to accept reality in circular logic does not make you correct.

  • People actually voted for that guy

  • I go through this with my cat sometimes. He will flat out refuse to eat certain brands of cat food. I always have to have him taste a little bit before I move to something different.

  • Little spoon versus big spoon

  • This is how we all felt in 2016

  • The turd doesn’t fall far from the asshole

  • Don’t be a lemon

  • Ha!