Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
7
Comments
639
Joined
2 yr. ago

Refugee from another, less-friendly instance. Please forgive the youth of my account— I’ve actually been around here for a while. Still, glad to be here!

  • Way too late. Almost immediately afterwards, he started crying about how “weak” FoxNews is.

  • They probably didn’t. They’re probably just repeating what they heard some Fox News host say

  • She handled him, tho. Kept saying, “excuse me, let me finish” and didn’t let him stop her

  • It says a fuck ton of people wanted to watch Kamala Harris wipe the floor with Brett Baier

  • Lol

  • Frosted strawberry

  • Still does

  • Obviously, but I’m sure he would fight it till his last dying breath. And I’m sure it would cause absolute chaos.

  • I just don’t believe that Trump would go along with that.

  • My bad, I got Vast mixed up with Vera.

    I edited my original comment.

  • A lot of rockets will probably be needed for the new space station being planned by Vast. That starts launching modules in 2028.

    Edit: Vera -> Vast

  • Thanks! :-)

  • They DID agree to share it

    I saw in another comment.

    That doesn’t negate the public interest in protecting such data, as I have said.

    Besides, that clause may not hold up in court.

  • Thanks for posting this.

    While my first point may have been flawed, by second still stands.

  • possibly not

  • That’s speculation, not fact, and I also don’t agree that owning a thing necessarily means you can sell it in an unrestricted/unregulated manner (guns, tobacco, as well as other sensitive medical info can’t just be sold willy-nilly)— especially when the “it” is sensitive biometric data whose originators never agreed to share it. That’s the problem when you and the greedy corporations you’re defending assume implicit consent rather than to ask for it: it’s damaging to the public and invades these people’s medical privacy in the name of profit.

    And whether 23andMe should be subject to HIPAA laws is debatable at best.

  • Because those people never agreed to it being used by anyone else. And it’s in the public interest to protect everyone from their highly-sensitive biometric data being misused.

  • Fortunately, whether you watch or not has zero effect on the outcome of the debate