I don't disagree. But people generally don't want bombs dropped on their heads and will avoid it until it becomes the final option. Until that time comes, small groups will be shot or imprisoned. Just like what happened in Texas last week. Just like what happened with BLM. There are countless examples of people rising against, only to be stomped because the fed arrives. Trump would love any excuse to fuck over the midterms, and would be happy to kill some left leaning opposition if given the chance.
Further, the US is very spread out. The cities and urban areas are relatively easy to get together. It's everywhere else that needs the ability to join the crowd. It's not like Europe where it's fairly easy to travel around, unfortunately.
If you want my thoughts on what we should do, it's to actually hurt what they care about most: their wallets. A general, nationwide strike would work well. However, to make it so people don't just starve to death, we need to set up a strike fund or food network. With that, the strike could last long enough to affect their bottom lines, and people would actually be willing to participate, knowing that their family won't starve to do it.




That is exactly my point. People outside of the US are expecting it to be easy and want immediate results. It won't be easy nor will it be immediate.