Sometimes knowing what the actual package name is without some kind of browser or being told what it is explicitly can be a challenge, but that really is the only hard part.
Unfortunately they DO notice when you actually take sick days. Avoiding taking sick days isn't so much about thinking you'll get rewarded as it is about trying not to get punished.
Are they supposed to? I didn't infer any link between them. I just thought they were random slang words from that era, contrasting the different feel they have.
I'm at 75, and it's really the limit of what I can stand. Occasionally I have to lower it to 73 for an hour or so to pull some of the humidity out of the air.
I still strongly disagree. "No, you can't use this at all" is more abusive than "ok, we'll let you use this if you agree to something else". If you didn't agree with the terms, you are no worse off than the other choice. Android is the "only choice" exactly because Apple won't share.
How can one be considered abusive and the other not, if companies are free to choose not to use android, just like companies can't use Apple's OS? Both have the same result, the company not using the OS. Google's position is more permissive than Apples, yet Apple's isn't considered abusive.
Right. Google gives away AOSP to any manufacturer. Apple doesn't let ANYONE else use their OS. Yet Google is the one who gets in trouble for being "restrictive".
I'm not upset that Google is getting called it for this, they are not innocent. I just want Apple to be held to the same standard.
Sometimes knowing what the actual package name is without some kind of browser or being told what it is explicitly can be a challenge, but that really is the only hard part.