Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
353
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • How long were you in the US? It's normal for sudden diet changes to temporarily cause constipation. I'm an American, and eating in Mexico made me super constipated. Also most people I know are at least daily, if not more

  • It's talking about absurd things people will say about other countries. The statement the teacher made was absurd, with zero grounds for evidence.

  • Open-source slicing has always been built on a tradition of collaboration and attribution. Slic3r, created by Alessandro Ranellucci and the RepRap community, laid the foundation. PrusaSlicer by Prusa Research built on Slic3r and acknowledged that heritage. Bambu Studio in turn forked from PrusaSlicer, and SuperSlicer by @supermerill extended PrusaSlicer with community-driven enhancements. Each project carried the work of its predecessors forward, crediting those who came before.

    OrcaSlicer began in that same spirit, drawing from BambuStudio, PrusaSlicer, and ideas inspired by CuraSlicer and SuperSlicer.

    Source

  • Wish they had the opposite. I feel like most people want to know who to go to, less so on who to avoid. I can see the usefulness in the list, but it's backwards when people want to find someone

  • But they said don't use the key or the secret knock, otherwise they'll write a blog shit talking you.

  • It's possible this was just added by the guy for his proof of concept, so I guess we'll see when more information is released.

    So what’s the scenario they are protecting themselves against?

    I mean, if you had a USB backdoor why wouldn't you automate the removal of evidence? It would make disposal a lot faster. You can just unplug it and physically destroy it to be safe.

    I think it’s more likely they would cover it on their side with some easily erasable USB drive.

    Why not both? Redundancy never hurt.

  • Not to mention there is more than likely a clock in/out system that controls the tracking information

  • people hide that they’re MAGA

    Where are you that they're hiding?

  • getting kids addicted to IG in order to feed my kids

    People do a lot worse to do the same thing.

    Not to mention Meta employs over 70,000 people. If you wanted to avoid all big tech companies, you would have to get very lucky in your employment opportunities

  • empathy limits one’s ability to make money (in this economy)

    Idk if there's any economy where greed and empathy work well together

  • They said in the article they recreated it on their own. So it couldn't just be the proof of concept.

    If some FBI agent is using a USB drive to unlock a laptop at work, what’s the point of making the drive single use?

    Under cover/covert operations do actually happen.

  • You think they just offered a backdoor to the US government unprompted? They just changed their mind? I know technically there isn't evidence of it being for the government, but like... Come on. Something like this isn't a bug or AI hallucinating

  • Your “plain language” goes from “do a thing” very quickly to “do a thing. but not that thing. or that other thing. and and and…”

    Your options would be write all those things in plain language, or program them all eith (hopefully) no mistakes, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Either way you have to catch all the situations. Even in plain language, not everybody will be able to effectively use AI to generate code. You need to have a solid understanding of software architecture to be able to get useful output.

    when it comes to creating programs, you want the output to be deterministic

    AI is capable of writing deterministic programs.

    I would also like to preemptively emphasize that AI is not there yet. I am simply talking about the concept of machines creating software. If you try to step back from your anti-AI gut reaction and truly think about it, it would make sense to do if we get there technologically

  • This is dangerous for me to say on lemmy, but fuck it.

    Doesn't it make sense that machines would write for machines? Isn't that kind of what we already do by creating compilation layers programmers use? We obviously wouldn't write the manual 1's and 0's, and most people don't write using assembly. Is this not a translation layer for us to be able to write code?

    Right now we have LLMs writing with languages designed for humans, and it's already doing some pretty wild stuff. If we get to the point where AI is literally a coding model (and not a generic LLM) that is able to use an AI optimized way of writing code, who knows what it would be capable of.

    Code is one of the few things AI is specially suited for. AI is just a big fancy prediction machine, so what better application than something that is by definition formulaic and patternistic like code? I am not saying we are there now, but rather the idea that machines should write software does make sense when it becomes actually feasible.

    If we could have programmed like this from the beginning, we would have. There has been many evolutions of making it easier to code. What's easier than plain language?

  • The difference is that there is a switch. Chrome does not. Not to mention, Firefox has optional AI features, which is different from a local AI model automatically installed. Mozilla/Mozilla staff has been vocal about how bad of an idea it is to make local AI a web standard reference

  • Headlines like that discourage a lot of users from clicking. Seems like clickbait

  • It's normal to shower before going to a gas station for 5 minutes?

  • < :-( >

    Jump