Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
1159
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I agree, but often times these are written intentionally confusing. The info should be presented in a manor that the entire population can understand it clearly.

    Make the existing situation more digestible while improving the education system. Unfortunately, there are many adults that are no longer in the education system that won't directly benefit from better education standards, so we need to accommodate them as well.

  • Wait... An AI slop 'distro' has a significant, built in RCE vulnerability? No way.

  • It's definitely being pushed by influencers, but there's no way it's getting any real adoption. People already familiar with Linux aren't installing this for real use em masse, and people not familiar aren't going this route with their first distro. I think the hype is all fabricated and pushed to the forefront of the algorithm.

  • Ooof. You know that if you're a Republican and Kavanaugh blocks your request, you got nothing.

  • Not sure what you quoted there, but I never said those words.

    I never said there wasn't risk. My reply to your initial comment is pointing out that what you said is defeatist. Per my other reply, you can see that I literally said that the GOP could be successful.

    You're misquoting me and claiming I'm and absolutist when I never once said anything is certain, and I fact said the opposite.

  • So we should just accept that it's over and the GOP has already won? That's defeatism.

  • There is, and what you said is defeatism. Your comment leaves no room for success, just acceptance that Trump will be the next president. There absolutely is a risk that the GOP will be successful in there election fuckery, but comments like yours are like propaganda that can lead to apathy whether that's your intent or not. It's not a warning, it's accepting that it's a foregone conclusion

  • Keep pushing more defeatism, that'll surely help.

  • It depends on your tolerance for how bad that person is and how much you want to contribute to their financial well being. For JK Rowling, my opinion is that if JK just said she doesn't like trans people, I'd disagree, but that by itself may not be a reason to not enjoy the work produced by her. However, she actively fights to put down trans people and spreads transphobia. That is reason enough for me to never do anything that will finance her and therefore support her actions.

    In this case, Tolkein is long dead. Nothing I do now will contribute to him further pushing and supporting fascism.

    Everyone gets to make this choice on their own. Nobody said you're not allowed to enjoy that art. If you decide that you're fine supporting artists through thick or thin and there's no line they can cross that will turn you away, then you can't be surprised or upset when other people change their opinion of you as a person. If you're okay with that, then that's fine, it's your life, live it.

  • Racists have been big on rallies for a long time. Do they provide the hoods at the door or is it BYOH?

  • You're probably right. It's very possible nothing I read in there is factually true.

  • No doubt this is written as a smear, but that actions were still all taken by democratic leadership. I'm sure this is sensationalized to make it sound worse than it is.

  • Thanks for the response. That's all pretty interesting.

  • Is the DC you work more for storage or is it high compute like DCs for LLMs? I'm just curious how the size and heat generation would compare if it's not.

  • If this tool was my kid, I'd leave too.

  • I saw I comment the other day where someone referred to them as Nationalist Christians, or Nat-Cs for short. That to me is a better description because to them, nationalism is their first priority, so it should be the first part of the label, and then the short name... Well, that's clear I think.

  • Perhaps it would be more apt to say "Jesus's actions align with socialism" but that's just a long form way of saying that Jesus was a socialist. Just because the term didn't exist back then doesn't mean that he wasn't a socialist.

    Ada Lovelace is regarded as the first ever programmer, and she lived about 150 years before the first computers were invented.

    People were doing math well before math was documented and defined.

    Dinosaurs weren't called dinosaurs until humans named them that, but they were always dinosaurs.

    Using modern terms to label history is just a simpler way to discuss historical events and people.

  • I don't have faith in the SCOTUS to not fuck this up, but the law looks to be written pretty explicitly in favor of the veto referenda. Being that there's no accountability for SC justices, they wouldn't have to justify why they voted in favour of Hoskins, but if they did, I can't see any valid argument, or really even any false arguments.

  • If you read the article, you'll see this has nothing do to with Republicans even though it reads like something they do maliciously.

    The rules were written by Democrats and are being enforced by Democrats. I can't say if what they're doing is fair, but the points made in the article sounds like there are some valid justifications, but I'm not well versed enough to know if they are valid.