in dr frankenstein's defense it's kinda hard to get peer reviewed while you're doing the experiment. that usually happens after you've done all the sciency stuff, crunched all the numbers, written up a paper, and sent it off to be reviewed.
For a start, my name's not Clyde, it's Vincent. It's in my username. Thought you'd've figured that out. Second, it's an argument about why letting a bunch of individuals who have no incentive to care what happens to the group go wild with no previously-agreed-upon restrictions about how much they should use is bad, and that's not true of any socialist movements I'm aware of. Thirdly, the photo on the Wikipedia page for tragedy of the commons is of pollution.
Are you absolutely positive you're a leftist? Because people who are left of center don't typically call each other "eco-fascists" for pointing out easily verifiable facts about ecology that do not involve human interference in any way.
absolutely wild that someone would assume someone's political views based on their understanding of ecosystems-level biology, but on lemmy, somehow, i'm no longer surprised
Democrats are so full of themselves, they won’t accept that they might have to step out of the way to prevent the republicans from ruining this country
This couldn't have been cornier if you'd said it's harder to come out as conservative nowadays than as gay. Do better.