Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
7
Comments
3036
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • why did we break fossil fuel production records under Biden after trump broke them?

    Trump 1 had record leases and all that new drilling came through while Biden was president, but Biden tried to cut back

    the problem is we’re talking about two different things

    It may have ramped up on Biden’s watch, but this is a Trump thing

    Global Warming isn’t just a nimby issue

    Sure, but I had responded to your question political statement and you changed the thread so we ended up in different places

    No one here will disagree with the global warming part. The us is both the largest historical emitters of carbon and one of those most resisting change. Yes in this case global warming is very much us centric. In this case the world really can’t do it without us

  • You may be missing my point.

    Yes, production is up

    But usage is down and that extra production goes toward exports (not that export is any different for the climate)

    And while this might be more tenuous, it follows record drilling leases by the first Trump administration. It may have ramped up on Biden’s watch, but this is a Trump thing.

    Biden cut way back on leases for drilling

  • Here’s a graph showing overall fossil fuel USAGE in the US peaked about 2008. The Biden years do show an upward trend but it looks more like COVID recovery and flattens out well under 2008

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/244429/us-fossil-fuel-energy-consumption-by-sector/

    But this probably explains what you see. Check out this graph of petroleum exports sky rocketing in recent years, including during Biden years as new drilling technology like fracking and horizontal drilling quickly turned us into the biggest oil producing country. Oil companies have been getting rich

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/191320/total-us-petroleum-exports/

    And here’s one that explains the different. Look at drilling leases by president and you’ll see far less under Biden. Trump 1 had record leases and all that new drilling came through while Biden was president, but Biden tried to cut back. Remember, oil wells don’t magically produce on day 1

    https://www.voronoiapp.com/natural-resources/Oil--Gas-Leases-on-Public-Lands-Under-Obama-Trump-and-Biden-3282

  • I can’t speak for all LLMs but the ones I use

    • web based LLM cites its sources. You can just click
    • coding LLM tends to have obvious sources (for example if I tell it to use a vendor API to do something, I know there's API documentation as the source of truth and the script is just like the example I would previously have found on StackOverflow.com).

    And yes, I frequently check its work and iterate through telling it to

  • I’m currently watching a video about the Qatari bribe of a private 747 (“free” will cost twice as much as the new Air Force one initiated by Obama and will leave with Trump) …..

    Apparently Trump’s plan for his library is to build a huge hotel with his Qatari jet bribe in the lobby on a prime lot in downtown Miami that somehow was sold to him for $10 (where’s that bribe investigation ?)

    Finally getting to my point …. The way to control Drump for those of us unable to pay massive bribes is to use flattery, play to his vanity and narcissism. We could sidetrack him into paying attention to that hotel and he might just forget about minor things like being president. He’ll, let’s hire some British royal guards to really treat him like royalty, keep his focus on himself

  • But why? If you try to be objective, how is this any different from an op Ed or other published article? Those are good starting points as well, but also shouldn’t be published as your work or trusted as is.

    The problem with LLMs is not when people use them as a tool, but when they use inappropriately, blindly trust them or treat them as a final result instead of thinking, reviewing, or adding value.

  • They’ll always be good for cheap labor and no regulations. Think how we spent the last half century outsourcing everything to China or India, it’ll be even better outsourcing to a third world hellhole close to home

  • Part of the “problem” is the toll is too low. It seriously undercuts the the Moroun Family Bridge tolls so the fear is it will attract most of the traffic. Think of the poor billionaire who somehow bought a bridge

  • You wanted consistency? Sure Trump actually did a few things right his first term, but responded to bribes a lot more in his second

  • the economy was headed in the right direction as a whole, but those are the bottom weren’t seeing it.

    Id go even farther than that. Biden started a lot of good things, not just the better economy, but way too much was longer term and no one has an attention span anymore. Too many voters can’t look at a chart and see “lines goes up” or a schedule and see “next decade is mighty fine”

  • I still find it incomprehensible that any appreciable number of voters chose that guy, or chose him more than once

    He started off with decades of poor headlines as a grifter, narcissist, and failed developer ….. did people really believe that stupid “reality” show creates to establish a new image? But then everyone saw what he did the first time around: even if your only knowledge is “reality” tv, why would you repeat that?

  • Another person replying with nothing other than an insult just to try triggering? Do I need to block you too?

  • I don’t know about going that far - LLMs can be a great starting point …. As long as you click through to the sources rather than blindly accept

  • Debt is going into completely uncontrollable territory - you think if aoc wins presidency she can do anything?

    In a lawful world, she can’t. The president can only propose. The budget, including taxes, is the responsibility of Congress. Blame republican congressmen for the extra trillions in tax cuts to the wealthy. Blame both parties for decades of kicking the can down the road

  • We are broke because of a couple decades tax cuts for the wealthy

    Sending equipment to Ukraine was a bargain, much cheaper than this fiasco in Iran

    • might actually be noble
    • no costs for aircraft or navy
    • no risk to American servicemen
    • improved military readiness. We were giving them older stock and restocking ourselves the latest and greatest
    • opportunity to learn how to fight a modern war
    • opportunity to develop drone warfare
  • It’s a strange thing to think about: traditionally the us military is so highly budgetted that we could afford to lose an excessive amount of high priced equipment and ordinance compared to anyone else. If we spend ten times a potential opponent, no problem

    But now in a world with low priced drone swarms and almost as low priced third world missiles, the multiplier is thousands, tens of thousands ….. I believe there were aircraft losses so the multiplier might be millions. Even the us military can’t afford a war with those multipliers. And that’s assuming we could build the ordinance fast enough

    Even stranger that I haven’t seen this discussed in news media

  • Ignore being a dick and stop trolling

  • No, u

  • Y’all are not as grown up as you think you are